RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

judylime/grokking

Default branch main · commit 5434e096 · scanned 6/1/2026, 11:42:50 AM

GitHub: 528 stars · 301 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
25 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
0 pass · 1 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface judylime/grokking, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Expand README to clearly state purpose and audience

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # grokking
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # grokking

This repository provides Go language implementations for the exercises and concepts presented in the popular "Grokking Algorithms" textbook. It's designed to help software engineers and students deeply understand and practice fundamental computer science algorithms and data structures, particularly for technical interview preparation.
  • highabout#2
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Go language implementations for "Grokking Algorithms" exercises, designed for software engineers and students preparing for technical interviews.
  • hightopics#3
    Add relevant topics for categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    algorithms, data-structures, go, golang, computer-science, interview-preparation, grokking-algorithms, education, learning

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface judylime/grokking
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LeetCode
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LeetCode · recommended 2×
  2. Introduction to Algorithms (CLRS) · recommended 1×
  3. Algorithms by Robert Sedgewick and Kevin Wayne · recommended 1×
  4. The Algorithm Design Manual by Steven S. Skiena · recommended 1×
  5. MIT OpenCourseware · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best resources for deeply understanding fundamental computer science algorithms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Introduction to Algorithms (CLRS)
    2. Algorithms by Robert Sedgewick and Kevin Wayne
    3. The Algorithm Design Manual by Steven S. Skiena
    4. MIT OpenCourseware
    5. Stanford Algorithms Specialization on Coursera
    6. Grokking Algorithms by Aditya Bhargava
    7. LeetCode

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named judylime/grokking. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find materials to master essential programming concepts and data structures?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cracking the Coding Interview
    2. Coursera
    3. HackerRank
    4. LeetCode
    5. GeeksforGeeks
    6. Introduction to Algorithms
    7. freeCodeCamp

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named judylime/grokking. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    warn

    Suggestion:

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of judylime/grokking?
    pass
    AI named judylime/grokking explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts judylime/grokking in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named judylime/grokking explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo judylime/grokking solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named judylime/grokking explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of judylime/grokking. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/judylime/grokking.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/judylime/grokking)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/judylime/grokking"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/judylime/grokking.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

judylime/grokking — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite