RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk

Default branch main · commit 2d15349c · scanned 6/12/2026, 8:32:47 PM

GitHub: 963 stars · 40 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the repository's purpose as an archive of a community discussion event

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following sentence immediately after the H1: '이 저장소는 매주 진행되는 AI 연구 논문 만담 커뮤니티 이벤트의 아카이브입니다. (This repository is an archive of a weekly AI research paper discussion community event.)'
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, machine-learning, arxiv, research-papers, community, discussion, journal-club, weekly-talks, korean
  • mediumabout#3
    Expand the repository description and add a homepage URL

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Description: [Zoom & Facebook Live] Weekly AI Arxiv 시즌2
Homepage:
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Description: Archive of 'Weekly Arxiv Talk' – a Korean community event for light, weekly discussions and overviews of new AI research papers via Zoom & Facebook Live.
Homepage: https://www.facebook.com/weeklyaiarxivpage/videos

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Hacker News (YC News)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Hacker News (YC News) · recommended 1×
  2. Reddit (r/MachineLearning) · recommended 1×
  3. Twitter · recommended 1×
  4. LessWrong · recommended 1×
  5. AI Discord Servers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a community for light discussions on new AI research papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hacker News (YC News)
    2. Reddit (r/MachineLearning)
    3. Twitter
    4. LessWrong
    5. AI Discord Servers
    6. The Gradient (Newsletter/Community)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good resources for quick overviews of recent AI research papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Papers With Code
    2. AI Explained
    3. Two Minute Papers
    4. The Batch
    5. arXiv Sanity Preserver
    6. Hugging Face Blog
    7. SyncedReview

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk?
    pass
    AI named jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

jungwoo-ha/WeeklyArxivTalk — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite