RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

jzhang38/TinyLlama

Default branch main · commit bf122247 · scanned 6/22/2026, 11:38:08 AM

GitHub: 8,992 stars · 624 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
62 /100
Needs work
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #1.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface jzhang38/TinyLlama, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to improve discoverability for fine-tuning and general LLM use

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, large-language-model, tinyllama, llama, pretraining, fine-tuning, finetuning, machine-learning, deep-learning, ai, generative-ai, nlp, transformer, small-language-model
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a sentence to the README's introduction about fine-tuning suitability

    Why:

    CURRENT
    We adopted exactly the same architecture and tokenizer as Llama 2. This means TinyLlama can be plugged and played in many open-source projects built upon Llama. Besides, TinyLlama is compact with only 1.1B parameters. This compactness allows it to cater to a multitude of applications demanding a restricted computation and memory footprint.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    We adopted exactly the same architecture and tokenizer as Llama 2. This means TinyLlama can be plugged and played in many open-source projects built upon Llama, and its compact size makes it particularly suitable for efficient fine-tuning on custom datasets. Besides, TinyLlama is compact with only 1.1B parameters. This compactness allows it to cater to a multitude of applications demanding a restricted computation and memory footprint.
  • mediumabout#3
    Enhance the repository description to highlight its utility and impact

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The TinyLlama project is an open endeavor to pretrain a 1.1B Llama model on 3 trillion tokens.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    The TinyLlama project is an open endeavor to pretrain a 1.1B Llama model on 3 trillion tokens, providing a compact and efficient foundation for research and deployment of small language models.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface jzhang38/TinyLlama
Avg rank
#1.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
10%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Phi-2
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Phi-2 · recommended 1×
  2. NanoGPT · recommended 1×
  3. OpenLLaMA · recommended 1×
  4. DistilBERT · recommended 1×
  5. Mistral 7B · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a small, efficient generative AI model for deployment on resource-limited hardware.
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TinyLlama ← you
    2. Phi-2
    3. NanoGPT
    4. OpenLLaMA
    5. DistilBERT
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are compact open-source large language models suitable for fine-tuning on custom datasets?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mistral 7B
    2. Llama 2 (facebookresearch/llama)
    3. Gemma (google/gemma)
    4. TinyLlama 1.1B (TinyLlama/TinyLlama)
    5. Phi-2 (microsoft/phi-2)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named jzhang38/TinyLlama. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of jzhang38/TinyLlama?
    pass
    AI did not name jzhang38/TinyLlama — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts jzhang38/TinyLlama in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named jzhang38/TinyLlama explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo jzhang38/TinyLlama solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named jzhang38/TinyLlama explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of jzhang38/TinyLlama. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/jzhang38/TinyLlama.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/jzhang38/TinyLlama)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/jzhang38/TinyLlama"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/jzhang38/TinyLlama.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

jzhang38/TinyLlama — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite