RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

karthink/gptel

Default branch master · commit 983cb1fe · scanned 6/19/2026, 8:21:56 AM

GitHub: 3,390 stars · 405 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
73 /100
Needs work
Category recall
2 / 2
Avg rank #5.5 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface karthink/gptel, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README opening to highlight extensibility and Emacs's power

    Why:

    CURRENT
    gptel is a simple Large Language Model chat client for Emacs, with support for multiple models and backends. It works in the spirit of Emacs, available at any time and uniformly in any buffer.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    gptel is an extensible Large Language Model (LLM) chat client for Emacs, designed to integrate AI capabilities seamlessly into your powerful text editor workflow. It supports multiple models and backends, working in the spirit of Emacs to be available at any time and uniformly in any buffer.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu/gptel.html
  • lowtopics#3
    Add more descriptive topics to enhance categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    chatgpt, emacs, llms, org-mode
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    chatgpt, emacs, llms, org-mode, ai-assistant, generative-ai, emacs-package

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
2 / 2
100% of queries surface karthink/gptel
Avg rank
#5.5
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
8%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
copilot.el
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. copilot.el · recommended 2×
  2. llm.el · recommended 2×
  3. ollama.el · recommended 1×
  4. chatgpt.el · recommended 1×
  5. emacs-openai · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate large language model capabilities directly into my Emacs workflow?
    you: #3
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ollama.el
    2. copilot.el
    3. gptel ← you
    4. llm.el
    5. chatgpt.el
    6. emacs-openai
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best options for an extensible AI chat client within a powerful text editor?
    you: #8
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. VS Code
    2. GitHub Copilot Chat
    3. CodeGPT
    4. Continue
    5. Emacs
    6. llm.el
    7. copilot.el
    8. gptel ← you
    9. Neovim/Vim
    10. nvim-cmp
    11. ChatGPT.nvim
    12. Copilot.vim
    13. llm.nvim
    14. JetBrains IDEs
    15. IntelliJ IDEA
    16. PyCharm
    17. JetBrains AI Assistant
    18. Sublime Text
    19. Helix
    20. helix-ai
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of karthink/gptel?
    pass
    AI named karthink/gptel explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts karthink/gptel in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named karthink/gptel explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo karthink/gptel solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named karthink/gptel explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of karthink/gptel. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/karthink/gptel.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/karthink/gptel)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/karthink/gptel"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/karthink/gptel.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

karthink/gptel — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite