RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

kenforthewin/atomic

Default branch main · commit d148eaeb · scanned 5/26/2026, 4:52:08 PM

GitHub: 1,481 stars · 100 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface kenforthewin/atomic, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add an explicit H1 title to the README clarifying the project's domain

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Atomic: Self-Hosted AI-Augmented Personal Knowledge Base
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics to include key features and technologies

    Why:

    CURRENT
    knowledge-base
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    knowledge-base, knowledge-graph, personal-knowledge-management, pkm, ai, semantic-search, markdown, self-hosted
  • mediumabout#3
    Refine the 'About' description for maximum clarity and keyword density

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Self-hosted, semantically-connected personal knowledge base
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Atomic is a self-hosted, AI-augmented personal knowledge base that turns markdown notes into a semantically-connected knowledge graph.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface kenforthewin/atomic
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. Mem.ai · recommended 1×
  3. Logseq · recommended 1×
  4. Notion · recommended 1×
  5. Roam Research · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I manage my personal knowledge base with AI-powered semantic connections?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Mem.ai
    3. Logseq
    4. Notion
    5. Roam Research
    6. TiddlyWiki

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named kenforthewin/atomic. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What self-hosted tools create a knowledge graph from my markdown notes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Dataview (blacksmithgu/obsidian-dataview)
    3. Juggl (emmenko/obsidian-juggl)
    4. Logseq (logseq/logseq)
    5. Athens Research (athensresearch/athens)
    6. TiddlyWiki (TiddlyWiki/TiddlyWiki5)
    7. Joplin (laurent22/joplin)
    8. Foam (foambubble/foam)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named kenforthewin/atomic. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of kenforthewin/atomic?
    pass
    AI named kenforthewin/atomic explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts kenforthewin/atomic in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named kenforthewin/atomic explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo kenforthewin/atomic solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named kenforthewin/atomic explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of kenforthewin/atomic. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/kenforthewin/atomic.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/kenforthewin/atomic)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/kenforthewin/atomic"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/kenforthewin/atomic.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

kenforthewin/atomic — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite