RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

kharvd/gpt-cli

Default branch main · commit bff5d873 · scanned 6/11/2026, 8:22:10 AM

GitHub: 725 stars · 82 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface kharvd/gpt-cli, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to highlight multi-LLM and feature-rich capabilities

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # gpt-cli

Command-line interface for chat LLMs.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # gpt-cli

A feature-rich command-line interface for interacting with multiple large language models, including ChatGPT, Claude, Bard, and other OpenAI-compatible APIs, offering advanced features like usage tracking and model customization.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant URL (e.g., a project website, documentation, or a more detailed GitHub Pages site) to the 'Homepage' field in the repository settings.
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a brief comparison section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, e.g., '## Comparison to other LLM CLIs', briefly outlining how `gpt-cli` differentiates itself from tools like `llm` (e.g., focus on direct chat interaction vs. scripting/plugins) and `OpenAI CLI` (multi-LLM support, advanced features).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface kharvd/gpt-cli
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
cURL
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. cURL · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI CLI · recommended 1×
  3. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  4. Ollama · recommended 1×
  5. Python with `requests` library · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I interact with large language models directly from my terminal?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. cURL
    2. OpenAI CLI
    3. LM Studio
    4. Ollama
    5. Python with `requests` library
    6. `llm`
    7. LiteLLM

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named kharvd/gpt-cli. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What CLI tools offer cost tracking and model parameter customization for AI assistants?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Python Library (openai/openai-python)
    2. LiteLLM (BerriAI/litellm)
    3. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    4. LangSmith
    5. Helicone (Helicone/helicone)
    6. OpenRouter (OpenRouter/OpenRouter)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named kharvd/gpt-cli. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of kharvd/gpt-cli?
    pass
    AI named kharvd/gpt-cli explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts kharvd/gpt-cli in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named kharvd/gpt-cli explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo kharvd/gpt-cli solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name kharvd/gpt-cli — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of kharvd/gpt-cli. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/kharvd/gpt-cli.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/kharvd/gpt-cli)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/kharvd/gpt-cli"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/kharvd/gpt-cli.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

kharvd/gpt-cli — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite