RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server

Default branch main · commit a9864a40 · scanned 6/1/2026, 8:42:07 PM

GitHub: 822 stars · 109 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening statement to clearly state its purpose for AI agents

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **An MCP server that enables AI agents to control web browsers using browser-use.**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **An MCP server designed for AI agents and LLMs to programmatically control web browsers, enabling AI assistants to browse and interact with web content.**
  • highabout#2
    Improve the repository description to explicitly mention AI agents and LLMs

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Browse the web, directly from Cursor etc.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An MCP server enabling AI agents and LLMs to programmatically control web browsers for automation and interaction.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics related to AI agents and LLMs

    Why:

    CURRENT
    browser, browser-use, cursor, mcp, mcp-server, playwright
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    browser, browser-use, cursor, mcp, mcp-server, playwright, ai-agents, llm, ai-automation, web-automation-for-ai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Playwright
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Playwright · recommended 1×
  2. LangChain · recommended 1×
  3. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  4. Selenium WebDriver · recommended 1×
  5. Puppeteer · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I programmatically control a web browser using AI agents for automation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. LangChain
    3. LlamaIndex
    4. Selenium WebDriver
    5. Puppeteer
    6. Browserless.io
    7. Autobahn
    8. OpenAI API

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools enable AI assistants to browse the web and interact with content?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    2. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    3. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    4. Beautiful Soup (crummy/BeautifulSoup)
    5. Requests (psf/requests)
    6. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    7. SerpApi
    8. Google Search API

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server?
    pass
    AI did not name kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

kontext-security/browser-use-mcp-server — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite