RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

lablup/backend.ai

Default branch main · commit 143b84a9 · scanned 6/4/2026, 5:32:08 AM

GitHub: 643 stars · 176 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface lablup/backend.ai, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to emphasize AI/ML specialization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Backend.AI is a streamlined, container-based computing cluster platform that hosts popular computing/ML frameworks and diverse programming languages, with pluggable heterogeneous accelerator support including CUDA GPU, ROCm GPU, Rebellions, FuriosaAI, HyperAccel, Intel Gaudi, Tenstorrent, Google TPU, Graphcore IPU and other NPUs.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Backend.AI is a specialized, multi-tenant computing cluster platform designed for AI/ML workloads, offering streamlined container-based execution across diverse programming languages and pluggable heterogeneous accelerators including CUDA GPU, ROCm GPU, Gaudi NPU, Google TPU, GraphCore IPU, and more.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand the repository's topics list with AI/ML-specific keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    api, backendai, cloud-computing, containers, distributed-computing, docker, documentation, hpc, monitoring, paas, python
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    api, backendai, cloud-computing, containers, distributed-computing, docker, documentation, hpc, monitoring, paas, python, machine-learning, deep-learning, gpu-computing, npu, ai-platform, mlops
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled '## Comparison to Alternatives' or '## Why Backend.AI?' that briefly explains how Backend.AI differs from general-purpose orchestrators like Kubernetes or specific ML platforms like Kubeflow, focusing on its strengths in fine-grained resource management for heterogeneous AI/ML accelerators and multi-tenancy.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface lablup/backend.ai
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Kubernetes
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Kubernetes · recommended 2×
  2. OpenShift · recommended 2×
  3. Open Data Hub · recommended 2×
  4. Kubeflow · recommended 1×
  5. NVIDIA AI Enterprise · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What platform manages containerized AI/ML workloads across heterogeneous accelerators and diverse languages?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Kubernetes
    2. Kubeflow
    3. OpenShift
    4. Open Data Hub
    5. NVIDIA AI Enterprise
    6. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    7. Azure Machine Learning
    8. Amazon SageMaker

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named lablup/backend.ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to set up a multi-tenant computing cluster for distributed jobs with GPU/NPU support?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Kubernetes
    2. NVIDIA GPU Operator
    3. KubeFlow
    4. OpenShift
    5. Open Data Hub
    6. HPE GreenLake for ML Operations
    7. Determined AI
    8. Slurm
    9. Singularity/Apptainer
    10. Docker
    11. Ray
    12. KubeRay
    13. Apache Mesos
    14. Marathon
    15. Aurora

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named lablup/backend.ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of lablup/backend.ai?
    pass
    AI named lablup/backend.ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts lablup/backend.ai in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named lablup/backend.ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo lablup/backend.ai solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name lablup/backend.ai — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of lablup/backend.ai. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/lablup/backend.ai.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/lablup/backend.ai)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/lablup/backend.ai"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/lablup/backend.ai.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

lablup/backend.ai — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite