RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

langtalks/swe-agent

Default branch main · commit 5946af4f · scanned 5/31/2026, 10:48:14 PM

GitHub: 632 stars · 127 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
47 /100
Critical
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #16.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface langtalks/swe-agent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    swe-agent, ai-agent, multi-agent-system, software-engineering, code-automation, langgraph, llm-agents, autonomous-ai, code-generation, ai-development
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify the README's opening sentence for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A sophisticated AI-powered software engineering agent that automates code implementation through intelligent planning and execution. Built with LangGraph for reliable multi-agent workflows.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    SWE-Agent is an autonomous AI-powered multi-agent system designed for end-to-end software engineering, automating code implementation and planning through intelligent workflows built with LangGraph.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Why SWE-Agent?' or 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., 'Why SWE-Agent?' or 'Comparison with other AI Agents,' that explicitly outlines how SWE-Agent differentiates itself from other autonomous coding agents (e.g., GPT-Engineer, Auto-GPT) in terms of multi-agent architecture, planning depth, or specific use cases.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface langtalks/swe-agent
Avg rank
#16.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
4%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CodiumAI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CodiumAI · recommended 2×
  2. Cursor.sh · recommended 1×
  3. GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  4. Claude 3 · recommended 1×
  5. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate code implementation and planning using an AI agent system?
    you: #16
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor.sh
    2. GPT-4
    3. Claude 3
    4. GitHub Copilot Chat
    5. VS Code
    6. JetBrains IDEs
    7. OpenAI's API
    8. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    9. Anthropic
    10. Google
    11. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    12. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    13. Auto-GPT (Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT)
    14. BabyAGI (yoheinakajima/babyagi)
    15. CodiumAI
    16. SWE-agent (princeton-nlp/SWE-agent) ← you
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an AI-driven system for structured code changes through multi-agent planning and execution.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. GPT-Engineer
    3. Auto-GPT
    4. BabyAGI
    5. LangChain
    6. LlamaIndex
    7. CodiumAI
    8. OpenAI API

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named langtalks/swe-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of langtalks/swe-agent?
    pass
    AI did not name langtalks/swe-agent — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts langtalks/swe-agent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named langtalks/swe-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo langtalks/swe-agent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named langtalks/swe-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of langtalks/swe-agent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/langtalks/swe-agent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/langtalks/swe-agent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/langtalks/swe-agent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/langtalks/swe-agent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

langtalks/swe-agent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite