RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

latitude-dev/latitude-llm

Default branch development · commit 75846139 · scanned 6/21/2026, 10:41:30 AM

GitHub: 4,171 stars · 334 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface latitude-dev/latitude-llm, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a 'Key Features' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why Latitude? Key Features for AI Agent Monitoring
    
    Latitude provides comprehensive monitoring for your AI agents and LLM applications, focusing on:
    
    *   **Performance Monitoring:** Track latency, token usage, and cost across all your LLM calls.
    *   **Error Tracing & Debugging:** Pinpoint issues with detailed traces of agent steps, tool calls, and LLM interactions.
    *   **Observability for AI Agents:** Gain deep insights into agent decision-making, prompt engineering, and RAG pipeline performance.
    *   **Real-time Alerts:** Configure custom alerts for anomalies, performance degradation, or specific error types.
    *   **Open-Source & Self-Hostable:** Full control over your data and infrastructure.
  • highreadme#2
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Latitude vs. Other AI Observability Tools
    
    While commercial and open-core solutions like LangSmith, Langfuse, Weights & Biases, and Arize AI offer valuable features, Latitude provides a **fully open-source, self-hostable platform** with a strong focus on **production readiness and operational concerns** for AI agent and LLM applications.
    
    Latitude differentiates itself by offering:
    *   **End-to-End Open Source:** Complete control over your data and infrastructure, unlike many proprietary or open-core alternatives.
    *   **Agent-Centric Observability:** Specialized tracing and monitoring built specifically for complex AI agent workflows, tool usage, and RAG pipelines.
    *   **Actionable Insights:** Go beyond basic logging to provide deep insights into agent decision-making, performance bottlenecks, and error root causes.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a dedicated sentence emphasizing open-source nature after the Sentry comparison

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center">Sentry, but for agents and LLMs.</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center">Sentry, but for agents and LLMs.</p>
    <p align="center">Latitude is a fully open-source and self-hostable platform for AI agent monitoring.</p>

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface latitude-dev/latitude-llm
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Grafana
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Grafana · recommended 2×
  2. Prometheus · recommended 2×
  3. LangSmith · recommended 1×
  4. Weights & Biases · recommended 1×
  5. Arize AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I monitor the performance and errors of my AI agents and large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangSmith
    2. Weights & Biases
    3. Arize AI
    4. Helicone
    5. Datadog
    6. New Relic
    7. Dynatrace
    8. Grafana
    9. Prometheus
    10. OpenReplay

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named latitude-dev/latitude-llm. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What's a good open-source alternative to Sentry for monitoring AI agent errors?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Langfuse
    2. OpenTelemetry
    3. Jaeger
    4. Grafana Tempo
    5. Grafana Loki
    6. Grafana
    7. ELK Stack
    8. Logstash
    9. Elasticsearch
    10. Kibana
    11. Prometheus

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named latitude-dev/latitude-llm. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of latitude-dev/latitude-llm?
    pass
    AI named latitude-dev/latitude-llm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts latitude-dev/latitude-llm in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named latitude-dev/latitude-llm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo latitude-dev/latitude-llm solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named latitude-dev/latitude-llm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of latitude-dev/latitude-llm. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/latitude-dev/latitude-llm.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/latitude-dev/latitude-llm)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/latitude-dev/latitude-llm"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/latitude-dev/latitude-llm.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

latitude-dev/latitude-llm — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite