RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

Default branch main · commit 7f58aaf1 · scanned 6/28/2026, 4:07:34 PM

GitHub: 528 stars · 63 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to declare 'awesome list' type

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently starts by defining 'What are Agent Skills?' after initial badges.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This is a curated list of awesome Agent Skills for automating legal work.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add explicit mention of the repository name in the README's introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README excerpt does not explicitly mention 'lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills' in its opening.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Welcome to `lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills`!
  • lowreadme#3
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This project is licensed under [Specific License Name(s) or description of terms]. See the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ContractPodAi
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ContractPodAi · recommended 1×
  2. ThoughtTrace · recommended 1×
  3. Luminance · recommended 1×
  4. Kira Systems · recommended 1×
  5. Josef · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate repetitive legal document drafting and review processes using AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ContractPodAi
    2. ThoughtTrace
    3. Luminance
    4. Kira Systems
    5. Josef
    6. OpenAI GPT
    7. DocuSign CLM

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help define reusable AI agent instructions for domain-specific professional workflows?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    4. OpenAI Assistants API
    5. Haystack
    6. Humanloop
    7. Vellum
    8. Pydantic

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills?
    pass
    AI did not name lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite