RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

liady/ChatGPT-pdf

Default branch main · commit cd4e8cd0 · scanned 5/15/2026, 6:32:03 PM

GitHub: 1,483 stars · 157 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface liady/ChatGPT-pdf, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics for categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    chrome-extension, firefox-extension, chatgpt, export, pdf, png, share, browser-extension, chat-history
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify README opening to counter AI misinterpretations

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # ChatGPT Export and Share
> A Chrome extension for downloading your ChatGPT history to PNG, PDF or creating a sharable link
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # ChatGPT Export and Share
> This browser extension (for Chrome, Edge, and Firefox) is specifically designed to export your ChatGPT conversation history. It allows you to download chats as PNG or PDF files or generate a sharable link, and is not a tool for interacting with PDF documents or a self-hosted AI application.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Link to the Chrome Web Store page, Firefox Add-ons page, or a dedicated project website]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface liady/ChatGPT-pdf
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  2. Notepad · recommended 1×
  3. microsoft/vscode · recommended 1×
  4. Google Docs · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft Word · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I easily save my ChatGPT conversations as a file or share them?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Notepad
    3. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)
    4. Google Docs
    5. Microsoft Word
    6. Save ChatGPT
    7. ChatGPT Export
    8. Microsoft Print to PDF
    9. Snipping Tool
    10. Snip & Sketch
    11. Spectacle
    12. GNOME Screenshot
    13. Lightshot
    14. GoFullPage

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named liady/ChatGPT-pdf. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What browser extensions allow exporting AI chat history to PDF or image?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT Export & Share
    2. PrintFriendly & PDF
    3. GoFullPage - Full Page Screen Capture
    4. SingleFile
    5. Awesome Screenshot & Screen Recorder

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named liady/ChatGPT-pdf. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of liady/ChatGPT-pdf?
    pass
    AI named liady/ChatGPT-pdf explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts liady/ChatGPT-pdf in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named liady/ChatGPT-pdf explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo liady/ChatGPT-pdf solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named liady/ChatGPT-pdf explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of liady/ChatGPT-pdf. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/liady/ChatGPT-pdf.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/liady/ChatGPT-pdf)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/liady/ChatGPT-pdf"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/liady/ChatGPT-pdf.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

liady/ChatGPT-pdf — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite