RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

lige47/lige_icon

Default branch main · commit df30244f · scanned 6/4/2026, 6:27:48 AM

GitHub: 510 stars · 44 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface lige47/lige_icon, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening sentence to specify niche

    Why:

    CURRENT
    本项目主要用于备份和分享自用图标库、分流规则及部分插件配置,适用于 Quantumult X、Loon、Surge、Fileball、Senplayer、Yamby、Hills 等工具。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    本项目提供专为 Quantumult X、Loon、Surge、Fileball、Senplayer、Yamby、Hills 等网络代理与媒体播放工具设计的自定义图标库、分流规则及插件配置。
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository root

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root containing the text of the MIT License.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add broader, category-level topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    hills, loon, quantumult-x, senplayer, surge
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    hills, loon, quantumult-x, senplayer, surge, custom-icons, icon-library, network-proxy, media-management, streaming-apps, configuration, rules

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface lige47/lige_icon
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Flaticon
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Flaticon · recommended 2×
  2. The Noun Project · recommended 2×
  3. Iconfinder · recommended 2×
  4. Font Awesome · recommended 2×
  5. Material Design Icons · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find custom icon sets for my network proxy applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Flaticon
    2. The Noun Project
    3. Iconfinder
    4. Font Awesome
    5. Material Design Icons
    6. Streamline Icons

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named lige47/lige_icon. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a collection of custom icons for various media management and streaming apps.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Font Awesome
    2. Material Design Icons
    3. The Noun Project
    4. Flaticon
    5. Iconfinder
    6. Streamline Icons
    7. Feather Icons

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named lige47/lige_icon. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of lige47/lige_icon?
    pass
    AI named lige47/lige_icon explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts lige47/lige_icon in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named lige47/lige_icon explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo lige47/lige_icon solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name lige47/lige_icon — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of lige47/lige_icon. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/lige47/lige_icon.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/lige47/lige_icon)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/lige47/lige_icon"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/lige47/lige_icon.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

lige47/lige_icon — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite