RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics

Default branch main · commit 0bd9bfc6 · scanned 6/1/2026, 10:38:15 PM

GitHub: 583 stars · 77 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to emphasize 'evaluation framework/toolkit'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ## **VQAScore for Evaluating Text-to-Visual Models [[Project Page]](https://linzhiqiu.github.io/papers/vqascore/)VQAScore allows researchers to automatically evaluate text-to-image/video/3D models using one-line of Python code!*
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## **VQAScore: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Text-to-Visual Models** [[Project Page]](https://linzhiqiu.github.io/papers/vqascore/)
    VQAScore is a comprehensive Python toolkit designed to automatically evaluate text-to-image/video/3D models using one-line of Python code, serving as a unified benchmark for generative AI.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics for evaluation and model types

    Why:

    CURRENT
    generative-ai, vision-language-model
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    generative-ai, vision-language-model, evaluation, metrics, benchmark, text-to-image, text-to-video, text-to-3d
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Why VQAScore?' or 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why VQAScore?
    While individual metrics like FID, CLIP Score, and IS are crucial for assessing generative models, VQAScore provides a unified and comprehensive framework to apply and integrate these and other advanced metrics for text-to-visual generation. Unlike standalone metric implementations, VQAScore offers a streamlined toolkit for researchers to benchmark and compare various text-to-image, text-to-video, and text-to-3D models efficiently.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CLIP Score
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CLIP Score · recommended 1×
  2. FID-CLIP · recommended 1×
  3. CLIP · recommended 1×
  4. FID · recommended 1×
  5. IS · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automatically assess the quality of generated images and videos from text prompts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CLIP Score
    2. FID-CLIP
    3. CLIP
    4. FID
    5. IS
    6. LPIPS
    7. DISTS
    8. FVD
    9. KID
    10. Amazon Mechanical Turk

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best metrics for evaluating generative AI models producing visual content?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Fréchet Inception Distance (FID)
    2. Inception Score (IS)
    3. Kernel Inception Distance (KID)
    4. Perceptual Path Length (PPL)
    5. Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS)
    6. Precision and Recall for Generative Models (PR)
    7. Human Evaluation (User Studies)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics?
    pass
    AI named linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

linzhiqiu/t2v_metrics — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite