RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily

Default branch master · commit dc3418e6 · scanned 5/30/2026, 7:07:47 AM

GitHub: 651 stars · 41 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    text-to-speech, tts, arxiv, daily-updates, research-papers, github-actions, paper-monitoring, speech-synthesis
  • highreadme#2
    Add a clear, concise opening statement to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides daily, automated updates of Text-to-Speech (TTS) research papers from arXiv, powered by GitHub Actions. It helps researchers and practitioners stay current with the latest advancements in speech synthesis.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
arXiv.org
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. arXiv.org · recommended 2×
  2. Twitter · recommended 2×
  3. Feedly · recommended 1×
  4. Inoreader · recommended 1×
  5. Google Scholar · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically monitor new academic papers in text-to-speech research daily?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. arXiv.org
    2. Feedly
    3. Inoreader
    4. Google Scholar
    5. Semantic Scholar
    6. Connected Papers
    7. ResearchRabbit
    8. Twitter

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a service to get daily updates on the latest speech synthesis research papers.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. arXiv.org
    2. Google Scholar Alerts
    3. Paper with Code
    4. Semantic Scholar Alerts
    5. Twitter
    6. Reddit

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily?
    pass
    AI named liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

liutaocode/TTS-arxiv-daily — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite