RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

lixiaolin94/skills

Default branch main · commit 0ec3c22e · scanned 7/1/2026, 3:12:41 PM

GitHub: 541 stars · 33 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface lixiaolin94/skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, llm-tools, agent-skills, claude-ai, weekly-report-automation, webgl-extraction, canvas-extraction, shader-porting
  • highlicense#2
    Create a LICENSE file with the MIT license

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a file named LICENSE in the repository root with the full text of the MIT License.
  • highreadme#3
    Strengthen the README's H1 and opening sentence

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Skills

A small collection of reusable skills for AI coding agents.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Reusable Skills for AI Coding Agents

A curated collection of modular, ready-to-use skills designed to extend the capabilities of AI coding agents, particularly for platforms like Claude Code.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface lixiaolin94/skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Microsoft Power BI
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Microsoft Power BI · recommended 1×
  2. Tableau · recommended 1×
  3. Google Looker Studio · recommended 1×
  4. Jupyter Notebooks · recommended 1×
  5. pandas-dev/pandas · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate generating weekly project reports from multiple data sources?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Microsoft Power BI
    2. Tableau
    3. Google Looker Studio
    4. Jupyter Notebooks
    5. Pandas (pandas-dev/pandas)
    6. Matplotlib (matplotlib/matplotlib)
    7. Plotly (plotly/plotly.py)
    8. ReportLab (ReportLab/reportlab)
    9. Fpdf (reingart/pyfpdf)
    10. Apache Airflow (apache/airflow)
    11. Smartsheet
    12. Qlik Sense
    13. Microsoft Excel
    14. Power Query
    15. VBA (Visual Basic for Applications)

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named lixiaolin94/skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to extract WebGL or Canvas shader effects from websites into standalone projects?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Spector.js
    2. Firefox Developer Tools
    3. Chrome Developer Tools
    4. Three.js
    5. Babylon.js
    6. ShaderToy
    7. GLSL Sandbox

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named lixiaolin94/skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of lixiaolin94/skills?
    pass
    AI named lixiaolin94/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts lixiaolin94/skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named lixiaolin94/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo lixiaolin94/skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named lixiaolin94/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of lixiaolin94/skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/lixiaolin94/skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/lixiaolin94/skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/lixiaolin94/skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/lixiaolin94/skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

lixiaolin94/skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite