RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge

Default branch main · commit ad3b4ce1 · scanned 6/1/2026, 1:42:52 PM

GitHub: 555 stars · 31 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A comprehensive, curated list of research papers and resources on the 'LLM as a Judge' paradigm, presented as an Awesome List and survey for AI researchers and practitioners.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm-as-a-judge, large-language-models, llm-evaluation, ai-evaluation, research-papers, survey, awesome-list, nlp, machine-learning
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the text of the MIT License, or another suitable open-source license for content.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI API
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  2. Anthropic Claude · recommended 1×
  3. Google Gemini · recommended 1×
  4. FastChat · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI Evals · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective methods for using large language models to evaluate other AI outputs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. Anthropic Claude
    3. Google Gemini
    4. FastChat
    5. OpenAI Evals
    6. LangChain
    7. LlamaIndex
    8. Guidance

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find comprehensive research on leveraging AI for automated content quality assessment?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Scholar
    2. ACM Digital Library
    3. IEEE Xplore
    4. arXiv.org
    5. Semantic Scholar
    6. ResearchGate
    7. Academia.edu
    8. Mendeley
    9. Zotero

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge?
    pass
    AI named llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

llm-as-a-judge/Awesome-LLM-as-a-judge — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite