RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

locuslab/wanda

Default branch main · commit 8e8fc87b · scanned 6/7/2026, 7:03:18 AM

GitHub: 865 stars · 129 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface locuslab/wanda, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to clarify its nature as a research approach

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Official PyTorch implementation of **Wanda** (Pruning by **W**eights **and a**ctivations), as presented in our paper:
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Wanda is a simple and effective *research approach* for pruning Large Language Models, implemented in PyTorch. It was first presented in our paper: 'A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Models'.
  • hightopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    large-language-models, network-pruning
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    large-language-models, network-pruning, llm-pruning, model-compression, deep-learning-pruning, research-project
  • mediumreadme#3
    Emphasize Wanda's core differentiator prominently in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Insert this sentence immediately after the initial project description and paper citation: "Unlike traditional magnitude pruning or methods relying on computationally expensive saliency scores, Wanda achieves state-of-the-art LLM pruning with remarkable simplicity and efficiency by focusing solely on weight and activation magnitudes."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface locuslab/wanda
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ONNX Runtime
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ONNX Runtime · recommended 2×
  2. TensorFlow Model Optimization Toolkit · recommended 2×
  3. Hugging Face Optimum · recommended 1×
  4. NVIDIA TensorRT · recommended 1×
  5. OpenVINO · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective techniques for shrinking large language models for deployment?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Optimum
    2. ONNX Runtime
    3. NVIDIA TensorRT
    4. OpenVINO
    5. PyTorch
    6. TensorFlow Model Optimization Toolkit
    7. Hugging Face Transformers
    8. TensorFlow
    9. DistilBERT
    10. TinyLlama
    11. MobileBERT
    12. LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)
    13. PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning)
    14. TVM (Apache TVM)

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named locuslab/wanda. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking simple and effective strategies for compressing neural networks, especially LLMs.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PyTorch Quantization
    2. ONNX Runtime
    3. TensorFlow Lite
    4. PyTorch Pruning
    5. TensorFlow Model Optimization Toolkit
    6. NVIDIA Apex (NVIDIA/apex)
    7. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    8. PaddlePaddle PaddleSlim (PaddlePaddle/PaddleSlim)
    9. DeepSpeed (microsoft/DeepSpeed)
    10. LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models)
    11. PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning) library by Hugging Face (huggingface/peft)
    12. TensorLy (tensorly/tensorly)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named locuslab/wanda. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of locuslab/wanda?
    pass
    AI named locuslab/wanda explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts locuslab/wanda in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named locuslab/wanda explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo locuslab/wanda solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name locuslab/wanda — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of locuslab/wanda. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/locuslab/wanda.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/locuslab/wanda)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/locuslab/wanda"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/locuslab/wanda.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

locuslab/wanda — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite