RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

longcw/MOTDT

Default branch master · commit 1aad7a3b · scanned 6/8/2026, 4:23:00 PM

GitHub: 535 stars · 131 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface longcw/MOTDT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise introductory sentence to the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ## MOTDT
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## MOTDT

This repository provides a real-time multiple people tracking system using deeply learned candidate selection and person re-identification, as presented at ICME 2018.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Key Differentiator' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ### Key Differentiator

MOTDT distinguishes itself by jointly optimizing object detection and feature learning for re-identification within a single deep learning framework, unlike many tracking-by-detection methods that treat these as separate, sequential steps.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface longcw/MOTDT
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
DeepSORT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. DeepSORT · recommended 2×
  2. ByteTrack · recommended 2×
  3. DeepStream SDK · recommended 1×
  4. opencv/opencv · recommended 1×
  5. YOLO · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to implement a real-time system for tracking multiple people in video?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DeepStream SDK
    2. OpenCV (opencv/opencv)
    3. YOLO
    4. SSD
    5. PyTorch (pytorch/pytorch)
    6. TensorFlow (tensorflow/tensorflow)
    7. DeepSORT
    8. ByteTrack
    9. MMTracking (open-mmlab/mmtracking)
    10. TensorFlow Object Detection API (tensorflow/models)
    11. MediaPipe (google/mediapipe)
    12. Ultralytics YOLO (ultralytics/ultralytics)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named longcw/MOTDT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source solutions exist for multi-object tracking with person re-identification?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ByteTrack
    2. StrongSORT
    3. BoT-SORT
    4. OSNet
    5. ResNet50
    6. DeepSORT
    7. FairMOT
    8. TrackFormer
    9. MOTR
    10. Quasi-Dense Tracking (QDT)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named longcw/MOTDT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of longcw/MOTDT?
    pass
    AI named longcw/MOTDT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts longcw/MOTDT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named longcw/MOTDT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo longcw/MOTDT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named longcw/MOTDT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of longcw/MOTDT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/longcw/MOTDT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/longcw/MOTDT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/longcw/MOTDT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/longcw/MOTDT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

longcw/MOTDT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite