RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

lucgagan/auto-playwright

Default branch main · commit 7f422b09 · scanned 6/13/2026, 11:41:57 AM

GitHub: 843 stars · 136 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface lucgagan/auto-playwright, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening statement to clarify its role as a Playwright extension

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Auto Playwright
    
    Run Playwright tests using AI.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Auto Playwright: AI-powered Utility for Playwright Tests
    
    `auto-playwright` is a library that extends Playwright, enabling you to automate browser test steps using natural language commands and AI (via OpenAI/ChatGPT). It simplifies writing and maintaining end-to-end tests by integrating AI directly into your Playwright test scripts.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand and refine repository topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, playwright
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    playwright, ai, test-automation, e2e-testing, natural-language-testing, chatgpt, openai, playwright-extension
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Other Tools' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison to Other Tools
    
    `auto-playwright` is designed as a lightweight library to enhance your existing Playwright test suite with AI capabilities, rather than a standalone test automation platform or a complete framework replacement. Unlike commercial solutions such as Testim.io or Mabl, `auto-playwright` integrates directly into your Playwright workflow, allowing you to leverage AI for specific steps within your familiar testing environment. It complements Playwright by adding natural language command processing, rather than replacing the core framework like Cypress or Playwright itself.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface lucgagan/auto-playwright
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Testim.io
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Testim.io · recommended 2×
  2. Mabl · recommended 2×
  3. Playwright · recommended 2×
  4. Cypress · recommended 2×
  5. Applitools · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automate browser test steps using natural language commands and AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Testim.io
    2. Mabl
    3. Applitools
    4. Playwright
    5. spaCy
    6. NLTK
    7. Selenium
    8. Cypress
    9. Robot Framework

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named lucgagan/auto-playwright. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a tool to simplify writing end-to-end browser tests with AI assistance.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Testim.io
    2. Applitools Ultrafast Test Cloud with AI
    3. Cypress
    4. Testim for Cypress
    5. Playwright
    6. Testim for Playwright
    7. Mabl
    8. Autify

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named lucgagan/auto-playwright. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of lucgagan/auto-playwright?
    pass
    AI named lucgagan/auto-playwright explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts lucgagan/auto-playwright in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named lucgagan/auto-playwright explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo lucgagan/auto-playwright solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named lucgagan/auto-playwright explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of lucgagan/auto-playwright. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/lucgagan/auto-playwright.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/lucgagan/auto-playwright)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/lucgagan/auto-playwright"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/lucgagan/auto-playwright.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

lucgagan/auto-playwright — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite