RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

m0n0x41d/haft

Default branch main · commit 06834406 · scanned 5/12/2026, 11:36:36 PM

GitHub: 1,321 stars · 104 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface m0n0x41d/haft, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Explicitly disambiguate from file servers in README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a prominent line in the README, perhaps right after 'What is Haft?', like: "To be clear: Haft is NOT a file server, static HTTP server, or file sharing utility. It is an engineering governor for AI-assisted software delivery."
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Why Haft?' section addressing AI agent governance challenges

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, perhaps after 'What is Haft?', titled '### Why Haft? (For AI-Assisted Development)' with content like: "In the era of AI coding agents, ensuring their outputs align with engineering specifications and best practices is paramount. Haft provides the framework to track engineering decisions, prevent stale assumptions, and manage evidence decay, acting as your critical governor for AI-generated code."
  • lowlicense#3
    Clarify the project's license(s) in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section or line in the README, e.g., "## License Haft is licensed under [State the actual license(s) here, e.g., 'a custom license combining Apache-2.0 and MIT terms as detailed in the LICENSE file.']. Please refer to the `LICENSE` file for full details."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface m0n0x41d/haft
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Sonarqube
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Sonarqube · recommended 1×
  2. ESLint · recommended 1×
  3. Pylint · recommended 1×
  4. Checkstyle · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI Evals · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to ensure AI coding agent outputs align with engineering specifications and best practices?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Sonarqube
    2. ESLint
    3. Pylint
    4. Checkstyle
    5. OpenAI Evals
    6. GitHub Actions
    7. GitLab CI/CD
    8. Jenkins
    9. Cypress
    10. Selenium
    11. Playwright
    12. Codecov
    13. Coveralls
    14. GitHub Pull Requests
    15. GitLab Merge Requests

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named m0n0x41d/haft. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to track engineering decisions for AI-generated code, preventing stale assumptions and evidence decay?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Confluence
    2. Jira
    3. GitHub Wiki
    4. GitLab Wiki
    5. MLflow (mlflow/mlflow)
    6. Weights & Biases
    7. Notion

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named m0n0x41d/haft. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of m0n0x41d/haft?
    pass
    AI named m0n0x41d/haft explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts m0n0x41d/haft in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named m0n0x41d/haft explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo m0n0x41d/haft solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named m0n0x41d/haft explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of m0n0x41d/haft. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/m0n0x41d/haft.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/m0n0x41d/haft)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/m0n0x41d/haft"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/m0n0x41d/haft.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

m0n0x41d/haft — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite