RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

m1guelpf/browser-agent

Default branch main · commit 99224539 · scanned 6/13/2026, 11:38:08 AM

GitHub: 721 stars · 68 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface m1guelpf/browser-agent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's introductory paragraph

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This project provides a bridge between GPT-4 and a headless Chromium browser, allowing you to automate actions simply by describing them to the program. It takes the form of a Rust CLI, but also exports most of the internals as a library for others to use.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This project is a **Rust-based AI agent** that bridges GPT-4 with a headless Chromium browser, enabling autonomous web interactions through natural language instructions. It functions as both a powerful CLI for describing and executing complex goals, and a library for integrating intelligent web automation into your Rust applications. It's ideal for advanced web scraping, task automation, and building intelligent bots.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Highlight the visual differentiation in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add this sentence immediately after the first paragraph in the README: "A key differentiator is its ability to leverage a **visual representation of the browser state (screenshots with annotated elements)** to guide the LLM's actions, enabling more human-like navigation and task completion."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface m1guelpf/browser-agent
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Playwright
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Playwright · recommended 1×
  2. GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  3. Claude 3 · recommended 1×
  4. langchain · recommended 1×
  5. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate web browser interactions using natural language instructions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. GPT-4
    3. Claude 3
    4. langchain
    5. LlamaIndex
    6. Browserflow
    7. Axiom.ai
    8. Robocorp
    9. Robot Framework
    10. Puppeteer
    11. Selenium

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named m1guelpf/browser-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a Rust-based tool to control a headless browser with AI commands.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Fantoccini (webdriver-rs/fantoccini)
    2. thirtyfour (thirtyfour-rs/thirtyfour)
    3. headless_chrome (rust-headless-chrome/rust-headless-chrome)
    4. Selenium (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    5. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named m1guelpf/browser-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of m1guelpf/browser-agent?
    pass
    AI did not name m1guelpf/browser-agent — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts m1guelpf/browser-agent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named m1guelpf/browser-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo m1guelpf/browser-agent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name m1guelpf/browser-agent — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of m1guelpf/browser-agent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/m1guelpf/browser-agent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/m1guelpf/browser-agent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/m1guelpf/browser-agent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/m1guelpf/browser-agent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

m1guelpf/browser-agent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite