RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

m1heng/clawdbot-feishu

Default branch main · commit b07885b7 · scanned 6/23/2026, 10:17:10 AM

GitHub: 4,278 stars · 451 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface m1heng/clawdbot-feishu, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Feishu/Lark channel plugin for OpenClaw, enabling AI agents to interact with enterprise team messaging platforms.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ["feishu", "lark", "openclaw", "ai-agent", "chatbot", "plugin", "integration", "enterprise-messaging", "workflow-automation"]
  • mediumreadme#3
    Reposition the README H1 and opening paragraph for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # clawd-feishu

Feishu/Lark (飞书) channel plugin for OpenClaw.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # clawd-feishu: Feishu/Lark Channel Plugin for OpenClaw AI Agents

This repository provides the official Feishu/Lark (飞书) channel plugin for OpenClaw, an extensible framework for building AI agents. It enables seamless integration of AI agents with enterprise team messaging platforms like Feishu, facilitating automated workflows and interactive chatbots.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface m1heng/clawdbot-feishu
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Microsoft Bot Framework
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Microsoft Bot Framework · recommended 1×
  2. Slack API · recommended 1×
  3. Bolt for Python · recommended 1×
  4. Bolt for JavaScript · recommended 1×
  5. Google Cloud Dialogflow Messenger · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to integrate an AI chatbot with enterprise team messaging platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Microsoft Bot Framework
    2. Slack API
    3. Bolt for Python
    4. Bolt for JavaScript
    5. Google Cloud Dialogflow Messenger
    6. Google Chat API
    7. Twilio Flex
    8. Twilio Programmable Messaging
    9. Zapier
    10. Make
    11. requests
    12. axios
    13. fetch

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named m1heng/clawdbot-feishu. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are extensible frameworks for building AI agents with diverse language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. AutoGPT
    6. BabyAGI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named m1heng/clawdbot-feishu. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of m1heng/clawdbot-feishu?
    pass
    AI did not name m1heng/clawdbot-feishu — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts m1heng/clawdbot-feishu in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named m1heng/clawdbot-feishu explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo m1heng/clawdbot-feishu solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named m1heng/clawdbot-feishu explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of m1heng/clawdbot-feishu. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/m1heng/clawdbot-feishu.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/m1heng/clawdbot-feishu)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/m1heng/clawdbot-feishu"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/m1heng/clawdbot-feishu.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

m1heng/clawdbot-feishu — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite