RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

maguowei/awesome-stars

Default branch master · commit 1548ca35 · scanned 5/25/2026, 1:52:53 PM

GitHub: 642 stars · 108 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface maguowei/awesome-stars, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and subtitle to emphasize public resource value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Awesome Stars [](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome)

> A curated list of my GitHub stars! Generated by starred.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Awesome Stars: A Curated Collection of Projects

> Discover valuable and interesting open-source projects across various languages, personally curated from GitHub stars and generated by [starred](https://github.com/maguowei/starred).
  • mediumabout#2
    Enhance repository description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    My Awesome List
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A curated collection of valuable and interesting open-source projects across various languages, personally selected from GitHub stars.
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a section to the README explaining its unique value

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example: `## Why use Awesome Stars?` or `## How is this list different?` and include text like: `Unlike algorithmically generated lists or single-topic collections, Awesome Stars offers a personally vetted, multi-topic selection of high-quality GitHub projects, ensuring a human touch and diverse range of useful resources.`

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface maguowei/awesome-stars
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ThoughtWorks Technology Radar
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ThoughtWorks Technology Radar · recommended 2×
  2. GitHub Explore · recommended 1×
  3. Awesome Lists · recommended 1×
  4. Hacker News · recommended 1×
  5. GitLab Explore · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a well-organized collection of highly-rated open-source projects across various languages.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Explore
    2. Awesome Lists
    3. ThoughtWorks Technology Radar
    4. Hacker News
    5. GitLab Explore
    6. Open Source Guides
    7. SourceForge

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named maguowei/awesome-stars. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive list of useful development tools and libraries?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Awesome Lists
    2. StackShare
    3. ThoughtWorks Technology Radar
    4. Hacker News (YC News)
    5. Dev.to
    6. Medium
    7. AlternativeTo

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named maguowei/awesome-stars. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of maguowei/awesome-stars?
    pass
    AI did not name maguowei/awesome-stars — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts maguowei/awesome-stars in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named maguowei/awesome-stars explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo maguowei/awesome-stars solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named maguowei/awesome-stars explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of maguowei/awesome-stars. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/maguowei/awesome-stars.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/maguowei/awesome-stars)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/maguowei/awesome-stars"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/maguowei/awesome-stars.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

maguowei/awesome-stars — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite