RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mateaix/mateclaw

Default branch dev · commit 5893d4b3 · scanned 6/18/2026, 3:52:13 PM

GitHub: 644 stars · 198 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mateaix/mateclaw, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify category and audience

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # MateClaw

<p align="center"><b>Your second brain</b></p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # MateClaw: Enterprise Multi-Agent AI Framework for Secure, Self-Hosted Deployments
  • highabout#2
    Update the 'about' description to emphasize enterprise and self-hosted aspects

    Why:

    CURRENT
    🤖 MateClaw — Your second brain with Multi-Agent Orchestration, MCP Protocol, Skills & Memory, Dream, and Multi-Channel Support. Built on Spring AI Alibaba.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    🤖 MateClaw — The enterprise-grade, self-hosted multi-agent AI framework for secure, multi-user applications. Features Multi-Agent Orchestration, MCP Protocol, Skills & Memory, Dream, and Multi-Channel Support, built on Spring AI Alibaba.
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, e.g., 'Why MateClaw? How We Compare', that explicitly contrasts MateClaw with frameworks like Spring AI, LangChain, LangChain4j, Haystack, and LlamaIndex. Highlight MateClaw's unique strengths for enterprise, self-hosted, multi-user, and Spring Boot environments, such as approval-gated actions, audit trails, and per-channel error isolation.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mateaix/mateclaw
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Spring AI
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Spring AI · recommended 1×
  2. LangChain4j · recommended 1×
  3. JADE · recommended 1×
  4. Akka · recommended 1×
  5. Apache Camel · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a robust multi-agent AI framework for enterprise applications using Spring Boot.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Spring AI
    2. LangChain4j
    3. JADE
    4. Akka
    5. Apache Camel

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named mateaix/mateclaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are secure self-hosted multi-user AI agent solutions for internal knowledge management?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Haystack
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. LangChain
    4. Chroma
    5. Weaviate
    6. Milvus
    7. PrivateGPT
    8. Llama 3
    9. Mistral
    10. Mixtral
    11. FastAPI
    12. Django
    13. Flask
    14. Sentence Transformers
    15. FAISS
    16. Annoy

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named mateaix/mateclaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mateaix/mateclaw?
    pass
    AI named mateaix/mateclaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mateaix/mateclaw in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name mateaix/mateclaw — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mateaix/mateclaw solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mateaix/mateclaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mateaix/mateclaw. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mateaix/mateclaw.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mateaix/mateclaw)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mateaix/mateclaw"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mateaix/mateclaw.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mateaix/mateclaw — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite