REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mbrg/power-pwn

Default branch main · commit 88456806 · scanned 6/28/2026, 8:16:52 PM

GitHub: 1,161 stars · 126 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

33 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

2 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mbrg/power-pwn, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Reposition README's core value proposition to the very top

Why:

CURRENT

The current README structure, where the core description appears after several links and an 'Overview' heading.

COPY-PASTE FIX

Start the README with a clear, concise statement that immediately positions the tool, for example:

# Power Pwn: The premier offensive and defensive security toolset specifically designed for Microsoft 365 Power Platform and AI services, enabling ethical assessment of AI Agents and low-code environments.

mediumreadme#2

Add a 'Why Power Pwn?' or 'Differentiators' section to the README

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

Add a new section to the README, for example:

## Why Power Pwn?
Unlike generic PowerShell post-exploitation frameworks, Power Pwn is purpose-built for the unique security challenges of Microsoft 365 Power Platform and AI services. It provides specialized tools for red teaming AI agents, Copilot Studio bots, custom GPTs, and low-code applications, offering capabilities beyond traditional Windows system exploitation.

lowabout#3

Update the GitHub 'about' description for clarity

Why:

CURRENT

An offensive/defense security toolset for discovery, recon and ethical assessment of AI Agents

COPY-PASTE FIX

Offensive/defensive security toolset for ethical assessment of AI Agents, Microsoft 365 Power Platform, and low-code environments.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface mbrg/power-pwn

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

Garak AI

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

Garak AI · recommended 1×
Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART) · recommended 1×
OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications · recommended 1×
Burp Suite Professional · recommended 1×
ZAP (OWASP Zed Attack Proxy) · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
How to perform security red teaming for AI chatbots and intelligent agents?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Garak AI
2. Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART)
3. OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications
4. Burp Suite Professional
5. ZAP (OWASP Zed Attack Proxy)
6. PromptInject
7. Metasploit Framework
8. requests
9. BeautifulSoup
10. selenium
11. MITRE ATT&CK
AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named mbrg/power-pwn. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
Tools to identify security risks in enterprise low-code application environments?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Checkmarx One
2. Veracode
3. Snyk
4. OWASP ZAP
5. Tenable.io
6. Lacework
7. Mend.io
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named mbrg/power-pwn. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
pass
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mbrg/power-pwn?
pass
AI did not name mbrg/power-pwn — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts mbrg/power-pwn in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named mbrg/power-pwn explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo mbrg/power-pwn solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI named mbrg/power-pwn explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mbrg/power-pwn. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mbrg/power-pwn.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mbrg/power-pwn)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mbrg/power-pwn"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mbrg/power-pwn.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mbrg/power-pwn — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite