RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

meleantonio/ChernyCode

Default branch main · commit 8a74a2ad · scanned 6/14/2026, 7:38:04 PM

GitHub: 506 stars · 103 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface meleantonio/ChernyCode, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A template repository with configurations and skills for maximizing productivity with AI coding assistants like Claude Code and Cursor, based on Boris Cherny's tips.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-coding-assistant, claude-code, cursor, productivity, developer-tools, ai-tools, coding-templates, boris-cherny
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root, choosing an appropriate open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0) and adding its SPDX identifier to the repository settings.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface meleantonio/ChernyCode
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 3 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 3×
  2. Visual Studio Code · recommended 1×
  3. VS Code · recommended 1×
  4. JetBrains IDEs · recommended 1×
  5. IntelliJ IDEA · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I set up my development environment for maximum AI coding assistant productivity?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Visual Studio Code
    2. VS Code
    3. GitHub Copilot
    4. JetBrains IDEs
    5. IntelliJ IDEA
    6. PyCharm
    7. WebStorm
    8. JetBrains AI Assistant
    9. Visual Studio
    10. GitHub Copilot
    11. Visual Studio AI Chat
    12. Neovim
    13. Vim
    14. GitHub Copilot
    15. copilot.vim
    16. Tabnine
    17. Google Colaboratory
    18. Colab
    19. Gemini in Colab
    20. Replit
    21. Ghostwriter

    AI recommended 21 alternatives but never named meleantonio/ChernyCode. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are best practices for organizing project context and instructions for AI coding agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. gpt-4o
    2. claude-3-opus
    3. Git

    AI recommended 3 alternatives but never named meleantonio/ChernyCode. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of meleantonio/ChernyCode?
    pass
    AI named meleantonio/ChernyCode explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts meleantonio/ChernyCode in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named meleantonio/ChernyCode explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo meleantonio/ChernyCode solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named meleantonio/ChernyCode explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of meleantonio/ChernyCode. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/meleantonio/ChernyCode.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/meleantonio/ChernyCode)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/meleantonio/ChernyCode"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/meleantonio/ChernyCode.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

meleantonio/ChernyCode — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite