RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

miantiao-me/aigc-weekly

Default branch master · commit be4920ab · scanned 6/2/2026, 9:43:17 PM

GitHub: 535 stars · 61 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface miantiao-me/aigc-weekly, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Clarify the repository's 'About' description to emphasize it's an open-source project for building an AI-driven digest.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Agili 的 AIGC 周刊 - 一个由 Agentic AI Agent 驱动的 AIGC（人工智能生成内容）精选周刊。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Agili 的 AIGC 周刊 - 一个由 Agentic AI Agent 驱动的开源项目，用于自动化 AIGC（人工智能生成内容）精选周刊的发现、策展和发布。
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add topics that reflect the project's output and purpose, not just its tech stack.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, ai, claude-agent, claude-code, cloudflare-containers, payloadcms
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, ai, claude-agent, claude-code, cloudflare-containers, payloadcms, aigc-weekly, news-digest, content-curation, automation, newsletter, serverless-app
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a feature highlighting the open-source, GitHub-native nature of the digest.

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add to '🚀 特性' section: '**开源透明**：内容和代码完全开源，方便社区协作和自定义部署。'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface miantiao-me/aigc-weekly
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Feedly
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Feedly · recommended 1×
  2. Google Alerts · recommended 1×
  3. Pocket · recommended 1×
  4. Zapier · recommended 1×
  5. Make · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate content discovery and curation for a weekly AI news digest?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Feedly
    2. Google Alerts
    3. Pocket
    4. Zapier
    5. Make
    6. NewsAPI.org
    7. GDELT Project
    8. Substack
    9. Ghost

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named miantiao-me/aigc-weekly. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to integrate AI agents with a headless content management system on a serverless platform?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Contentful
    2. AWS Lambda
    3. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    4. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    5. OpenAI API
    6. Anthropic Claude
    7. Strapi (strapi/strapi)
    8. Google Cloud Functions
    9. Google Gemini API
    10. Sanity.io
    11. Vercel Functions
    12. Azure OpenAI Service
    13. Directus (directus/directus)
    14. Cloudflare Workers
    15. Cohere API
    16. Pinecone
    17. Weaviate (weaviate/weaviate)
    18. Qdrant (qdrant/qdrant)
    19. Supabase pgvector (supabase/supabase)

    AI recommended 19 alternatives but never named miantiao-me/aigc-weekly. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of miantiao-me/aigc-weekly?
    pass
    AI named miantiao-me/aigc-weekly explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts miantiao-me/aigc-weekly in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named miantiao-me/aigc-weekly explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo miantiao-me/aigc-weekly solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name miantiao-me/aigc-weekly — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of miantiao-me/aigc-weekly. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/miantiao-me/aigc-weekly.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/miantiao-me/aigc-weekly)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/miantiao-me/aigc-weekly"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/miantiao-me/aigc-weekly.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

miantiao-me/aigc-weekly — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite