RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop

Default branch main · commit e89f560c · scanned 6/3/2026, 5:41:38 PM

GitHub: 884 stars · 476 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to emphasize building & prototyping

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Microsoft AI Agentic Workshop Repository
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Microsoft AI Agentic Workshop: Build & Prototype Multi-Agent AI Solutions
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add specific AI agent and orchestration topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    azure, cognitive-services, machine-learning, openai
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    azure, cognitive-services, machine-learning, openai, ai-agents, multi-agent-systems, agent-orchestration, ai-prototyping, business-ai-solutions
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Insert URL to the workshop's main landing page or documentation here]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. CrewAI · recommended 2×
  3. AutoGen · recommended 2×
  4. Haystack · recommended 2×
  5. OpenAI Assistants API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build an end-to-end multi-agent AI system for business scenarios?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. CrewAI
    3. AutoGen
    4. Haystack
    5. OpenAI Assistants API
    6. Faiss
    7. Pinecone
    8. Weaviate
    9. SQLAlchemy
    10. psycopg2
    11. mysql-connector-python
    12. Apache Kafka
    13. RabbitMQ

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks help prototype and compare various AI agent architectures and orchestration patterns?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. AutoGen
    5. CrewAI
    6. DSPy

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop?
    pass
    AI did not name microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/OpenAIWorkshop — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite