REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/TypeAgent

Default branch main · commit 04bb5fa5 · scanned 6/13/2026, 5:11:51 AM

GitHub: 706 stars · 100 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

35 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

3 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/TypeAgent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Reposition README opening to clarify TypeAgent's role as a type-driven framework

Why:

CURRENT

# TypeAgent

**NOTE: For the Python port see microsoft/typeagent-py.TypeAgent** is **sample code** that explores an architecture for building a _single personal agent_ with _natural language interfaces_ leveraging current advances in LLM technology.

COPY-PASTE FIX

# TypeAgent

**NOTE: For the Python port see microsoft/typeagent-py.**

TypeAgent is a **type-driven framework** for building robust personal agents that safely and efficiently combine large language models (LLMs) with traditional software components. It provides an architecture for structured LLM outputs and actions, leveraging TypeScript types for enhanced reliability and correctness in LLM-powered applications.

mediumtopics#2

Add relevant topics to improve categorization

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

llm-agents, personal-agents, llm-framework, typescript, type-safety, structured-llm-outputs, ai-architecture, llm-orchestration

lowhomepage#3
Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX
```
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeAgent
```

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface microsoft/TypeAgent

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

LangChain

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

LangChain · recommended 1×
LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
Haystack · recommended 1×
AutoGPT · recommended 1×
BabyAGI · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
How to build a personal agent combining LLMs with existing software components?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. LangChain
2. LlamaIndex
3. Haystack
4. AutoGPT
5. BabyAGI
6. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
7. OpenAI Assistants API
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named microsoft/TypeAgent. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
Frameworks for structuring LLM outputs and actions in an agent system?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
3. Haystack (deepset-ai/haystack)
4. Marvin (PrefectHQ/marvin)
5. Instructor (instructor-ai/instructor)
6. Guidance (microsoft/guidance)
7. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named microsoft/TypeAgent. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
warn
Suggestion:
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/TypeAgent?
pass
AI named microsoft/TypeAgent explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts microsoft/TypeAgent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named microsoft/TypeAgent explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/TypeAgent solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI named microsoft/TypeAgent explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/TypeAgent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/TypeAgent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/TypeAgent)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/TypeAgent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/TypeAgent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/TypeAgent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite