RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/Webwright

Default branch main · commit 734bc60e · scanned 5/30/2026, 7:51:50 PM

GitHub: 4,468 stars · 248 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/Webwright, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Update README H1 to clearly state the project's purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Webwright
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Webwright: A Framework for LLM-driven Web Automation and Browser Agents
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, llm, web-automation, browser-automation, playwright, python, generative-ai, large-language-models
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://microsoft.github.io/Webwright

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface microsoft/Webwright
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Playwright
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Playwright · recommended 2×
  2. LangChain · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. Beautiful Soup · recommended 1×
  5. Cheerio · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build an AI agent to automate complex, multi-step web browsing tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. LangChain
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Beautiful Soup
    5. Cheerio
    6. SerpApi
    7. Google Search API
    8. Pinecone
    9. Weaviate
    10. FastAPI
    11. Express.js

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named microsoft/Webwright. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a framework to enable LLMs to interact with web browsers using Python scripts.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Selenium
    3. Puppeteer
    4. Requests-HTML
    5. Splash

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named microsoft/Webwright. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/Webwright?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/Webwright explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/Webwright in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/Webwright explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/Webwright solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/Webwright explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/Webwright. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/Webwright.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/Webwright)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/Webwright"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/Webwright.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/Webwright — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite