RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit

Default branch main · commit 0f0e47b4 · scanned 5/14/2026, 10:26:21 AM

GitHub: 1,532 stars · 296 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to emphasize AI agent specificity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Agent Governance Toolkit
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Agent Governance Toolkit

The Agent Governance Toolkit provides essential policy enforcement, zero-trust identity, and execution sandboxing specifically designed for autonomous AI agents.
  • mediumabout#2
    Add the project's documentation site as the repository homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://microsoft.github.io/agent-governance-toolkit
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to reinforce AI agent security and governance

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent-framework, ai-agents, ai-safety, compliance, governance, microsoft, owasp, policy-engine, python, security, trust, zero-trust
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent-framework, ai-agents, ai-safety, ai-agent-security, ai-agent-governance, responsible-ai-agents, llm-security, llm-governance, compliance, governance, microsoft, owasp, policy-engine, python, security, trust, zero-trust

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Open Policy Agent (OPA)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Open Policy Agent (OPA) · recommended 1×
  2. Microsoft Azure Confidential Computing · recommended 1×
  3. Google Cloud Confidential Computing · recommended 1×
  4. AWS Nitro Enclaves · recommended 1×
  5. Kubernetes · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I ensure policy compliance and secure execution for my autonomous AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Open Policy Agent (OPA)
    2. Microsoft Azure Confidential Computing
    3. Google Cloud Confidential Computing
    4. AWS Nitro Enclaves
    5. Kubernetes
    6. CNCF Falco
    7. Snyk

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help implement zero-trust identity and sandboxing for AI agent security and governance?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Okta
    2. Microsoft Entra ID
    3. Auth0
    4. Google Cloud Identity
    5. gVisor (google/gvisor)
    6. Kata Containers (kata-containers/kata-containers)
    7. Open Policy Agent (OPA) (open-policy-agent/opa)
    8. SELinux/AppArmor

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite