RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/ebpf-for-windows

Default branch main · commit bd3f6c1c · scanned 5/28/2026, 3:28:37 PM

GitHub: 3,493 stars · 286 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
69 /100
Needs work
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #1.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/ebpf-for-windows, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ebpf, windows, kernel, observability, networking, security, system-programming, programmability, drivers
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition README intro to clarify role in Windows kernel extension

    Why:

    CURRENT
    eBPF is a well-known technology for providing programmability and agility, especially for extending an OS kernel, for use cases such as DoS protection and observability. This project is a work-in-progress that allows existing eBPF toolchains and APIs familiar in the Linux ecosystem to be used on top of Windows.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    eBPF is a well-known technology for providing programmability and agility, especially for extending an OS kernel, for use cases such as DoS protection and observability. This project is a work-in-progress that allows existing eBPF toolchains and APIs familiar in the Linux ecosystem to be used on top of Windows, offering a modern, programmable alternative or complement to traditional Windows kernel extension methods for network observability, security, and system programmability.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Insert official project homepage URL here, e.g., https://microsoft.github.io/ebpf-for-windows/ or a relevant documentation portal]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface microsoft/ebpf-for-windows
Avg rank
#1.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
7%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Windows Filtering Platform (WFP)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Windows Filtering Platform (WFP) · recommended 1×
  2. NDIS (Network Driver Interface Specification) Intermediate Drivers/Lightweight Filter (LWF) Drivers · recommended 1×
  3. ETW (Event Tracing for Windows) with Network Providers · recommended 1×
  4. Minifilter Drivers · recommended 1×
  5. Detours (Microsoft Research) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I extend Windows kernel functionality for network observability and security?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Windows Filtering Platform (WFP)
    2. NDIS (Network Driver Interface Specification) Intermediate Drivers/Lightweight Filter (LWF) Drivers
    3. ETW (Event Tracing for Windows) with Network Providers
    4. Minifilter Drivers
    5. Detours (Microsoft Research)
    6. Hyper-V Extensible Switch

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named microsoft/ebpf-for-windows. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are options for running Linux-style eBPF programs on a Windows operating system?
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. eBPF for Windows (microsoft/ebpf-for-windows) ← you
    2. Windows Subsystem for Linux
    3. VMware Workstation
    4. VirtualBox
    5. Hyper-V
    6. Cilium (cilium/cilium)
    7. K3s (k3s-io/k3s)
    8. MicroK8s (ubuntu/microk8s)
    9. Project Everest
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/ebpf-for-windows?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/ebpf-for-windows explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/ebpf-for-windows in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/ebpf-for-windows explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/ebpf-for-windows solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/ebpf-for-windows explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/ebpf-for-windows. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/ebpf-for-windows.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/ebpf-for-windows)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/ebpf-for-windows"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/ebpf-for-windows.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/ebpf-for-windows — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite