RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/rag-time

Default branch main · commit 69d3d38f · scanned 6/6/2026, 8:57:13 PM

GitHub: 887 stars · 313 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/rag-time, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to emphasize 'learning journey' and 'curriculum'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    🚀 Master RAG with RAG Time! Learn how to build smarter AI applications with Retrieval-Augmented Generation. This repo includes step-by-step guides, live coding samples, and expert insights—everything you need to go from beginner to RAG pro!
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    RAG Time is a comprehensive 5-week learning journey and ultimate guide to mastering Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). This repository serves as the official curriculum, providing step-by-step guides, live coding samples, and expert insights to take you from beginner to RAG pro.
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify that RAG Time is a learning resource, not an implementation library

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    While RAG Time covers advanced techniques like hybrid search, vector search, and quantization, it is designed as a pedagogical resource and structured course, not an implementation library, framework, or standalone tool.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add learning-focused topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, azure, binary-quantization, generative-ai, gpt, hnsw, hybrid-search, indexing, keyword-search, language-model, llm, matryoshka-representation-learning, multimodal, openai, rag, responsible-ai, retrieval-augmented-generation, scalar-quantization, vector-search, visual-studio-code
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, azure, binary-quantization, course, curriculum, education, generative-ai, gpt, guide, hnsw, hybrid-search, indexing, keyword-search, language-model, learning-path, llm, matryoshka-representation-learning, multimodal, openai, rag, responsible-ai, retrieval-augmented-generation, scalar-quantization, tutorial, vector-search, visual-studio-code

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface microsoft/rag-time
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Pinecone
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Pinecone · recommended 2×
  2. DeepLearning.AI · recommended 1×
  3. ChatGPT API · recommended 1×
  4. LangChain · recommended 1×
  5. Hugging Face · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive learning path to master retrieval augmented generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DeepLearning.AI
    2. ChatGPT API
    3. LangChain
    4. Hugging Face
    5. Transformers
    6. LlamaIndex
    7. Pinecone
    8. Papers With Code
    9. Kaggle
    10. YouTube
    11. AI Coffee Break with Let's Talk AI
    12. The AI Epiphany

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named microsoft/rag-time. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to implement advanced retrieval techniques like hybrid search for AI applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Vespa.ai
    2. Weaviate
    3. Elasticsearch
    4. Pinecone
    5. Qdrant
    6. Faiss
    7. Apache Lucene
    8. Apache Solr

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named microsoft/rag-time. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/rag-time?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/rag-time explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/rag-time in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/rag-time explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/rag-time solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/rag-time explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/rag-time. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/rag-time.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/rag-time)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/rag-time"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/rag-time.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/rag-time — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite