RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox

Default branch main · commit 94379f64 · scanned 5/10/2026, 3:16:17 PM

GitHub: 1,764 stars · 475 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening statement to emphasize comprehensive Responsible AI assessment

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Responsible AI Toolbox
    Responsible AI is an approach to assessing, developing, and deploying AI systems in a safe, trustworthy, and ethical manner, and take responsible decisions and actions.
    
    Responsible AI Toolbox is a suite of tools providing a collection of model and data exploration and assessment user interfaces and libraries that enable a better understanding of AI systems.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Responsible AI Toolbox: A Unified Platform for Holistic AI Assessment and Debugging
    
    The Responsible AI Toolbox is a comprehensive suite of tools designed to empower developers and stakeholders to assess, debug, and monitor AI systems responsibly. Unlike single-purpose tools, our platform provides a holistic view of model behavior, integrating capabilities for fairness, interpretability, error analysis, and causal decision-making into a single pane of glass.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add topics that highlight the toolbox's comprehensive platform nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    data-analysis, data-science, data-visualization, error-analysis, explainability, explainable-ai, explainable-ml, fairness, fairness-ai, fairness-ml, interpretability, jupyter, machine-learning, machinelearning, ml, responsible-ai, ui, visualization, widget, widgets
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    responsible-ai-platform, ai-governance, ai-observability, ml-ops-tools, ai-debugging-tools, responsible-ai, data-analysis, data-science, data-visualization, error-analysis, explainability, explainable-ai, explainable-ml, fairness, fairness-ai, fairness-ml, interpretability, jupyter, machine-learning, machinelearning, ml, ui, visualization, widget, widgets
  • lowreadme#3
    Add an explicit statement about the toolbox's unique value proposition compared to individual tools

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Unlike many individual tools that focus on a single aspect of Responsible AI, the Responsible AI Toolbox integrates multiple mature capabilities—including interpretability (powered by InterpretML), error analysis, and fairness—into a unified dashboard for holistic model assessment and debugging.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
shap/shap
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. shap/shap · recommended 2×
  2. marcotcr/lime · recommended 2×
  3. Trusted-AI/AIX360 · recommended 1×
  4. interpretml/interpret · recommended 1×
  5. PAIR-code/what-if-tool · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I assess and debug machine learning models for fairness and interpretability?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IBM AI Explainability 360 (AIX360) (Trusted-AI/AIX360)
    2. Microsoft InterpretML (interpretml/interpret)
    3. Google What-If Tool (WIT) (PAIR-code/what-if-tool)
    4. Google TCAV (Testing with Concept Activation Vectors) (tensorflow/tcav)
    5. Fairlearn (fairlearn/fairlearn)
    6. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) (shap/shap)
    7. LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) (marcotcr/lime)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help visualize AI system behavior and identify errors for responsible development?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TensorBoard (tensorflow/tensorboard)
    2. Weights & Biases (W&B) (wandb/wandb)
    3. MLflow (mlflow/mlflow)
    4. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) (shap/shap)
    5. LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) (marcotcr/lime)
    6. DeepView.ai
    7. Microsoft InterpretML (microsoft/interpret)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox?
    pass
    AI did not name microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite