RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/sammo

Default branch main · commit 2137815b · scanned 6/7/2026, 4:26:30 PM

GitHub: 760 stars · 45 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/sammo, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening sentence to emphasize systematic optimization and structured outputs

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A flexible, easy-to-use library for running and optimizing prompts for Large Language Models (LLMs).
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    SAMMO is a flexible, easy-to-use library for *systematically optimizing and evaluating* prompts for Large Language Models (LLMs), with advanced support for *structured outputs*.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics related to prompt optimization, evaluation, and structured outputs

    Why:

    CURRENT
    llms, prompt-engineering, prompt-tuning
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llms, prompt-engineering, prompt-tuning, prompt-optimization, llm-evaluation, structured-outputs, metaprompting
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://microsoft.github.io/sammo/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface microsoft/sammo
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. Weights & Biases Prompts · recommended 1×
  3. Humanloop · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI Evals · recommended 1×
  5. PromptLayer · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to systematically optimize and evaluate prompts for large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Weights & Biases Prompts
    2. LangChain
    3. Humanloop
    4. OpenAI Evals
    5. PromptLayer
    6. MLflow
    7. Pandas/NumPy

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named microsoft/sammo. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good libraries for advanced prompt engineering and structured LLM outputs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Instructor
    4. Guidance
    5. Pydantic
    6. Outlines

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named microsoft/sammo. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/sammo?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/sammo explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/sammo in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/sammo explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/sammo solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/sammo explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/sammo. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/sammo.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/sammo)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/sammo"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/sammo.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/sammo — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite