RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mims-harvard/UniTS

Default branch main · commit 0e028148 · scanned 5/30/2026, 12:52:25 PM

GitHub: 636 stars · 97 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mims-harvard/UniTS, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to highlight foundation model nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Unified Time Series Model
    
    **Project Page**  |   **Paper link(Neurips 2024)**
    
    UniTS is a unified time series model that can process various tasks across multiple domains with shared parameters and does not have any task-specific modules.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # UniTS: A Foundation Model for Unified Time Series Analysis
    
    **Project Page**  |   **Paper link(Neurips 2024)**
    
    UniTS is a novel *foundation model* for time series, inspired by the success of LLMs, that provides a unified approach to diverse tasks like forecasting, classification, imputation, and anomaly detection. It processes various time series tasks across multiple domains with shared parameters, eliminating the need for task-specific modules.
  • mediumabout#2
    Enhance repository description for clarity and AI categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A unified multi-task time series model.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A unified, LLM-inspired foundation model for multi-task time series analysis (forecasting, classification, anomaly detection, imputation).
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a comparison section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example, after the 'Overview' section, with the heading '## UniTS vs. Other Time Series Foundation Models'. Include content that details how UniTS's unified, multi-task, and LLM-inspired foundation model approach differentiates it from and improves upon existing time series models such as Informer, Autoformer, TimeGPT-2, Lag-Llama, and PatchTST.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mims-harvard/UniTS
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Informer
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Informer · recommended 2×
  2. Autoformer · recommended 2×
  3. PyTorch · recommended 1×
  4. TensorFlow · recommended 1×
  5. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build a single model for various time series tasks like forecasting and classification?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PyTorch
    2. TensorFlow
    3. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    4. PyTorch Forecasting (jdb78/pytorch-forecasting)
    5. tsfresh (blue-yonder/tsfresh)
    6. XGBoost (dmlc/xgboost)
    7. LightGBM (microsoft/LightGBM)
    8. CatBoost (catboost/catboost)
    9. scikit-learn (scikit-learn/scikit-learn)
    10. Facebook Prophet (facebook/prophet)
    11. Temporal Fusion Transformers
    12. Informer
    13. Autoformer
    14. Reformer

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named mims-harvard/UniTS. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a foundation model approach for diverse time series analysis without task-specific modules.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TimeGPT-2
    2. Lag-Llama
    3. PatchTST
    4. Informer
    5. Autoformer
    6. DeepAR
    7. Tide

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named mims-harvard/UniTS. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mims-harvard/UniTS?
    pass
    AI named mims-harvard/UniTS explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mims-harvard/UniTS in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mims-harvard/UniTS explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mims-harvard/UniTS solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mims-harvard/UniTS explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mims-harvard/UniTS. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mims-harvard/UniTS.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mims-harvard/UniTS)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mims-harvard/UniTS"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mims-harvard/UniTS.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mims-harvard/UniTS — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite