RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mind-protocol/terminal-velocity

Default branch main · commit d62248be · scanned 5/9/2026, 5:02:37 AM

GitHub: 1,099 stars · 79 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mind-protocol/terminal-velocity, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clarifying sentence to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Terminal Velocity - The First Novel Written by Autonomous AI Agents
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add this sentence immediately after the H1: 'This repository documents the creation and provides the full manuscript of **Terminal Velocity**, a groundbreaking novel written entirely by autonomous AI agents. *It is not a terminal emulator.*'
  • hightopics#2
    Expand repository topics with AI-specific keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    book, writing
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    book, writing, ai-novel, generative-ai, autonomous-agents, creative-writing-ai, llm-agents, ai-storytelling
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root. Choose a suitable open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0) for the project's code and documentation, or a Creative Commons license (e.g., CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) if the primary output is the novel content.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mind-protocol/terminal-velocity
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  2. Claude · recommended 1×
  3. Sudowrite · recommended 1×
  4. Jasper · recommended 1×
  5. NovelAI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI to write a complete novel or long-form story?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Claude
    3. Sudowrite
    4. Jasper
    5. NovelAI
    6. Grammarly
    7. ProWritingAid
    8. Hemingway Editor

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named mind-protocol/terminal-velocity. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools enable autonomous AI agents to collaborate on creative writing projects?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. AutoGPT
    3. BabyAGI
    4. CrewAI
    5. OpenAI API
    6. GPT-4
    7. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    8. Hugging Face Transformers Library
    9. Pinecone
    10. Weaviate
    11. Chroma
    12. GitHub
    13. GitLab

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named mind-protocol/terminal-velocity. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mind-protocol/terminal-velocity?
    pass
    AI named mind-protocol/terminal-velocity explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mind-protocol/terminal-velocity in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mind-protocol/terminal-velocity explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mind-protocol/terminal-velocity solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mind-protocol/terminal-velocity explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mind-protocol/terminal-velocity. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mind-protocol/terminal-velocity.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mind-protocol/terminal-velocity)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mind-protocol/terminal-velocity"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mind-protocol/terminal-velocity.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mind-protocol/terminal-velocity — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite