RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mitre/advmlthreatmatrix

Default branch master · commit 406e4a40 · scanned 5/14/2026, 10:33:11 PM

GitHub: 1,105 stars · 111 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mitre/advmlthreatmatrix, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update repository description to include ATLAS branding and clarify framework type

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Adversarial Threat Landscape for AI Systems
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ATLAS (Adversarial Threat Landscape for AI Systems): A MITRE ATT&CK-style framework for categorizing and understanding adversarial machine learning threats.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository root. Choose an appropriate open-source license (e.g., Apache-2.0, MIT) that aligns with MITRE's policies for their public projects.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mitre/advmlthreatmatrix
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART) · recommended 1×
  2. Foolbox · recommended 1×
  3. CleverHans · recommended 1×
  4. MITRE ATLAS · recommended 1×
  5. OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications (LLM Top 10) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I categorize and understand common adversarial attacks targeting machine learning models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART)
    2. Foolbox
    3. CleverHans

    AI recommended 3 alternatives but never named mitre/advmlthreatmatrix. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What framework helps security analysts identify and mitigate threats to AI/ML systems?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MITRE ATLAS
    2. OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications (LLM Top 10)
    3. NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)
    4. Microsoft Responsible AI Standard
    5. OWASP Machine Learning Security Top 10 (MLS Top 10)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named mitre/advmlthreatmatrix. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mitre/advmlthreatmatrix?
    pass
    AI did not name mitre/advmlthreatmatrix — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mitre/advmlthreatmatrix in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mitre/advmlthreatmatrix explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mitre/advmlthreatmatrix solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mitre/advmlthreatmatrix explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mitre/advmlthreatmatrix. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mitre/advmlthreatmatrix.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mitre/advmlthreatmatrix)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mitre/advmlthreatmatrix"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mitre/advmlthreatmatrix.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mitre/advmlthreatmatrix — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite