RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles

Default branch main · commit 9bdac924 · scanned 6/7/2026, 4:13:35 PM

GitHub: 598 stars · 11 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    macOS dotfiles split across nix home-manager (packages / programs.*) and chezmoi (per-user dotfile content), with APM layering Claude Code skills on top.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    dotfiles, macos, nix, home-manager, chezmoi, apm, ai-skills, claude-code, generative-ai
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Choose and add a standard SPDX license file (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0) to the repository root.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Nix / NixOS (with Nix-Darwin)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Nix / NixOS (with Nix-Darwin) · recommended 1×
  2. Homebrew · recommended 1×
  3. chezmoi · recommended 1×
  4. yadm · recommended 1×
  5. Homebrew Bundle · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to manage macOS dotfiles declaratively using multiple configuration tools?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Nix / NixOS (with Nix-Darwin)
    2. Homebrew
    3. chezmoi
    4. yadm
    5. Homebrew Bundle
    6. Ansible
    7. SaltStack
    8. GNU Stow

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What's the best way to manage personal AI assistant skills alongside system configurations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Home Assistant (home-assistant/core)
    2. ESPHome (esphome/esphome)
    3. Node-RED (node-red/node-red)
    4. OpenAI
    5. Google AI Studio
    6. OpenHAB (openhab/openhab-core)
    7. Jython (jython/jython)
    8. Groovy (apache/groovy)
    9. IOBroker (iobroker/ioBroker.js-controller)
    10. Flask (pallets/flask)
    11. FastAPI (tiangolo/fastapi)
    12. Express.js (expressjs/express)
    13. Docker (docker/docker-ce)
    14. Kubernetes (kubernetes/kubernetes)
    15. Docker Compose (docker/compose)
    16. IFTTT
    17. Zapier

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles?
    pass
    AI named mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mizchi/chezmoi-dotfiles — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite