RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mlcommons/croissant

Default branch main · commit 010a6f4e · scanned 6/8/2026, 11:47:16 AM

GitHub: 855 stars · 116 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mlcommons/croissant, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to clarify Croissant's unique role

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Croissant 🥐 is a high-level format for machine learning datasets that combines metadata, resource file descriptions, data structure, and default ML semantics into a single file; it works with existing datasets to make them easier to find, use, and support with tools.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Croissant 🥐 is *the* high-level format for machine learning datasets, providing a unified, machine-readable schema (JSON-LD) to describe their structure, semantics, and provenance, making them discoverable and usable across ML platforms and tools.
  • hightopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    datasets, json-ld, machine-learning, schema-org
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ml-datasets-format, dataset-metadata, ml-interoperability, schema-org, json-ld, machine-learning, datasets
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison to other tools' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, perhaps titled 'Croissant vs. Other Data Tools' or 'Why Croissant?', that clarifies its role as a *metadata format for ML datasets* and distinguishes it from data serialization formats (like Apache Parquet, Avro), data versioning tools (like DVC), or data quality frameworks (like Great Expectations). Emphasize that Croissant *describes* datasets for ML, rather than *stores*, *versions*, or *validates* the data itself.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mlcommons/croissant
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Apache Parquet
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Apache Parquet · recommended 2×
  2. MLflow · recommended 1×
  3. Great Expectations · recommended 1×
  4. Apache Avro · recommended 1×
  5. DVC · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to standardize metadata and structure for machine learning datasets for better tool support?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MLflow
    2. Great Expectations
    3. Apache Parquet
    4. Apache Avro
    5. DVC
    6. Frictionless Data
    7. Hugging Face Datasets library

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named mlcommons/croissant. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open format helps describe ML datasets with rich semantics and schema.org compatibility?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. JSON-LD
    2. DCAT
    3. Schema.org
    4. Apache Parquet
    5. YAML

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named mlcommons/croissant. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mlcommons/croissant?
    pass
    AI named mlcommons/croissant explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mlcommons/croissant in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mlcommons/croissant explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mlcommons/croissant solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mlcommons/croissant explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mlcommons/croissant. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mlcommons/croissant.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mlcommons/croissant)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mlcommons/croissant"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mlcommons/croissant.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mlcommons/croissant — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite