RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mmmwhy/pure_attention

Default branch master · commit d4f19e8c · scanned 6/9/2026, 8:28:03 AM

GitHub: 805 stars · 608 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mmmwhy/pure_attention, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to clearly state project ambition

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 介绍
    attention 在 cv 和 nlp 领域都有很多的应用,比如在 cv 中,可以使用 detr 进行目标检测任务,使用 vit / mae 进行图片预训练任务。
    在 nlp 领域中的作用更不用提, bert 以及后续的更多工作将 attention 彻底的发扬光大。
    cv 和 nlp 中的很多方法和技巧也在相互影响,比如大规模的预训练、mask 的设计(mae 、vilbert)、自监督学习的设计(从 imageNet 做有监督的预训练到纯粹的自监督预训练)。
    这些方面都非常的有趣,我希望可以设计一个 backbone 结构,让其可以在 cv 任务和 nlp 任务上均取到 sota 的效果。
    从而为之后的任务提供一个 baseline。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # mmmwhy/pure_attention: 统一的注意力机制骨干网络,赋能NLP与CV任务SOTA表现
    本项目旨在设计并实现一个高性能的注意力机制骨干网络(backbone),使其能够在自然语言处理(NLP)和计算机视觉(CV)任务中均达到最先进(SOTA)的效果。我们致力于提供一套完整的算法服务,包括Python训练和基于ONNX的Java在线推理部署,为未来的研究和应用提供坚实的基础。
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    attention, transformer, nlp, computer-vision, deep-learning, pytorch, onnx, backbone, sota
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/mmmwhy/pure_attention

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mmmwhy/pure_attention
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
pytorch/pytorch
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. pytorch/pytorch · recommended 1×
  2. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  3. tensorflow/tensorflow · recommended 1×
  4. keras-team/keras · recommended 1×
  5. google/jax · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I implement attention-based models for both NLP and computer vision tasks in Python?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PyTorch (pytorch/pytorch)
    2. transformers library (huggingface/transformers)
    3. TensorFlow (tensorflow/tensorflow)
    4. Keras (keras-team/keras)
    5. JAX (google/jax)
    6. Flax (google/flax)
    7. Haiku (deepmind/dm-haiku)
    8. fastai (fastai/fastai)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named mmmwhy/pure_attention. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a unified framework for Transformer encoder/decoder architectures across NLP and CV applications.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers
    2. PyTorch Lightning
    3. Keras
    4. JAX/Flax
    5. fairseq

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named mmmwhy/pure_attention. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mmmwhy/pure_attention?
    pass
    AI did not name mmmwhy/pure_attention — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mmmwhy/pure_attention in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mmmwhy/pure_attention explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mmmwhy/pure_attention solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mmmwhy/pure_attention explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mmmwhy/pure_attention. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mmmwhy/pure_attention.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mmmwhy/pure_attention)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mmmwhy/pure_attention"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mmmwhy/pure_attention.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mmmwhy/pure_attention — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite