RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mo-browser-apps/icons

Default branch master · commit 0b310be2 · scanned 5/30/2026, 9:57:44 PM

GitHub: 673 stars · 37 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mo-browser-apps/icons, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    macos, app-icons, icon-generator, ai-art, openai-api, desktop-app, icns
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify README's opening sentence to emphasize "AI-powered desktop app"

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A simple desktop app for generating **macOS app icons** in the `*.icns` format with AI.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    MōIcons is an **AI-powered macOS desktop application** for generating professional app icons in the `*.icns` format.
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mo-browser-apps/icons
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Midjourney
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Midjourney · recommended 2×
  2. DALL-E 3 · recommended 2×
  3. Adobe Firefly · recommended 1×
  4. Stable Diffusion · recommended 1×
  5. Automatic1111's web UI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I generate professional macOS application icons using artificial intelligence?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Midjourney
    2. DALL-E 3
    3. Adobe Firefly
    4. Stable Diffusion
    5. Automatic1111's web UI
    6. ComfyUI
    7. IconifyAI
    8. Adobe Photoshop
    9. Illustrator
    10. Affinity Designer

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named mo-browser-apps/icons. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help create `.icns` bundles for macOS apps from text descriptions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. iconutil
    2. ImageMagick (ImageMagick/ImageMagick)
    3. sips
    4. Pillow (python-pillow/Pillow)
    5. IconKit
    6. DALL-E 3
    7. Midjourney
    8. Stable Diffusion (stability-ai/stablediffusion)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named mo-browser-apps/icons. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mo-browser-apps/icons?
    pass
    AI named mo-browser-apps/icons explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mo-browser-apps/icons in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mo-browser-apps/icons explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mo-browser-apps/icons solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mo-browser-apps/icons explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mo-browser-apps/icons. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mo-browser-apps/icons.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mo-browser-apps/icons)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mo-browser-apps/icons"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mo-browser-apps/icons.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mo-browser-apps/icons — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite