RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

modem-dev/hunk

Default branch main · commit ae571017 · scanned 6/21/2026, 12:32:09 AM

GitHub: 5,225 stars · 130 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface modem-dev/hunk, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify category and purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # hunk
    
    Hunk is a review-first terminal diff viewer for agent-authored changesets, built on OpenTUI and Pierre diffs.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # hunk
    
    Hunk is a **terminal-based code review tool and diff viewer** that transforms how you review multi-file changesets, especially those from AI agents. It offers an interactive UI (built on OpenTUI and Pierre diffs) as a modern alternative to `git diff` for a streamlined review workflow.
  • mediumabout#2
    Enhance the 'About' description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Review-first terminal diff viewer for agentic coders
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Hunk is an advanced, review-first terminal diff viewer and code review tool. It provides an interactive TUI for efficiently reviewing multi-file changesets, particularly those generated by AI agents, offering a modern alternative to traditional `git diff`.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison to other tools
    Hunk stands out from tools like `delta` and `diff-so-fancy` by offering a full multi-file review stream with sidebar navigation and AI annotation support, rather than just enhancing single-file diff output. Compared to `tig` or `lazygit`, Hunk focuses specifically on the *review* experience of changesets, providing flexible layouts and agent-specific features, rather than being a general-purpose Git TUI.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface modem-dev/hunk
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
cli/cli
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. cli/cli · recommended 2×
  2. delta · recommended 1×
  3. diff-so-fancy · recommended 1×
  4. tig · recommended 1×
  5. lazygit · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need a better way to review multi-file code changes directly in my terminal.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. delta
    2. diff-so-fancy
    3. tig
    4. lazygit
    5. git diff

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named modem-dev/hunk. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are modern terminal code review tools that support AI annotations and flexible layouts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitLab
    2. glab (profclems/glab)
    3. GitHub CLI (cli/cli)
    4. gh (cli/cli)
    5. GitHub Copilot
    6. CodeGPT
    7. Neovim (neovim/neovim)
    8. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)
    9. Reviewdog (reviewdog/reviewdog)
    10. OpenAI's API
    11. Mergify (mergifyio/mergify)

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named modem-dev/hunk. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of modem-dev/hunk?
    pass
    AI named modem-dev/hunk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts modem-dev/hunk in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named modem-dev/hunk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo modem-dev/hunk solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named modem-dev/hunk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of modem-dev/hunk. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/modem-dev/hunk.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/modem-dev/hunk)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/modem-dev/hunk"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/modem-dev/hunk.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

modem-dev/hunk — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite