RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mshumer/ai-researcher

Default branch main · commit ee661022 · scanned 6/9/2026, 3:43:11 AM

GitHub: 948 stars · 105 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mshumer/ai-researcher, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An AI agent for automated, comprehensive research and report generation, leveraging LLMs (Claude 3, Gemini 1.5 Pro) and web search (SERPAPI). Includes a specialized YouTube video summarizer.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Enhance the README's opening to highlight the YouTube research capability

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # ai-researcher

The AI Researcher is an AI agent that utilizes Claude 3 and SERPAPI to perform comprehensive research on a given topic. It breaks down the research process into subtopics, generates individual reports for each subtopic, and then combines them into a final comprehensive report.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # ai-researcher: Automated AI Research & YouTube Video Summarization

The AI Researcher is an AI agent that utilizes Claude 3 and SERPAPI to perform comprehensive research on a given topic, breaking it down into subtopics and generating detailed reports. **Crucially, it also features a Gemini 1.5 Pro-powered version capable of synthesizing information from multiple YouTube videos into structured research reports.** This makes it ideal for both web-based and video-based information synthesis.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mshumer/ai-researcher
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. ChatGPT Plus / GPT-4 API · recommended 1×
  3. Scite.ai · recommended 1×
  4. Elicit.org · recommended 1×
  5. Semantic Scholar · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate comprehensive research and generate detailed reports on complex topics?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT Plus / GPT-4 API
    2. Scite.ai
    3. Elicit.org
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. Connected Papers
    6. Obsidian
    7. Zapier / Make

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named mshumer/ai-researcher. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools can synthesize information from multiple YouTube videos into a structured research report?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Trint
    2. Google Docs
    3. Microsoft Word
    4. Otter.ai
    5. Notion
    6. Obsidian
    7. ChatGPT Plus
    8. Descript
    9. YouTube's Built-in Transcripts

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named mshumer/ai-researcher. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mshumer/ai-researcher?
    pass
    AI did not name mshumer/ai-researcher — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mshumer/ai-researcher in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mshumer/ai-researcher explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mshumer/ai-researcher solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mshumer/ai-researcher explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mshumer/ai-researcher. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mshumer/ai-researcher.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mshumer/ai-researcher)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mshumer/ai-researcher"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mshumer/ai-researcher.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mshumer/ai-researcher — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
mshumer/ai-researcher — RepoGEO report