RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator

Default branch main · commit a851678f · scanned 5/31/2026, 1:27:41 AM

GitHub: 721 stars · 82 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clarify its unique AI-powered content analysis role

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # AI Enterprise Case Study Analyzer

An intelligent system for analyzing enterprise AI case studies using the Claude 3.5 Sonnet API.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # AI Investigator: Automated AI System for Website Content Analysis & Reporting

AI Investigator is a Python framework that automates the analysis of any website content and generates structured reports using advanced LLMs like Claude 3.5 Sonnet and web scraping tools like Firecrawl.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the text of a suitable open-source license (e.g., MIT License).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
explosion/spaCy
Recommended in 3 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. explosion/spaCy · recommended 3×
  2. pandas-dev/pandas · recommended 3×
  3. Apify · recommended 2×
  4. ParseHub · recommended 2×
  5. Octoparse · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate web content analysis and generate structured reports using AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Beautiful Soup
    2. Requests (psf/requests)
    3. spaCy (explosion/spaCy)
    4. Pandas (pandas-dev/pandas)
    5. ReportLab
    6. Scrapy (scrapy/scrapy)
    7. NLTK (nltk/nltk)
    8. spaCy (explosion/spaCy)
    9. Pandas (pandas-dev/pandas)
    10. Jinja2 (pallets/jinja)
    11. WeasyPrint (Kozea/WeasyPrint)
    12. Apify
    13. Google Cloud Natural Language API
    14. Azure Text Analytics
    15. Google Data Studio
    16. Microsoft Power BI
    17. ParseHub
    18. Octoparse
    19. MonkeyLearn
    20. MeaningCloud
    21. Google Sheets
    22. Microsoft Excel
    23. Tableau
    24. Power BI
    25. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    26. Selenium (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    27. spaCy (explosion/spaCy)
    28. Pandas (pandas-dev/pandas)
    29. FPDF
    30. PDFKit (foliojs/pdfkit)
    31. Diffbot
    32. Crawlbase Smart Proxy
    33. OpenAI API
    34. GPT-4
    35. GPT-3.5

    AI recommended 35 alternatives but never named muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help scrape websites and extract specific insights for business analysis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Beautiful Soup 4
    2. Requests
    3. Scrapy
    4. Puppeteer
    5. Selenium WebDriver
    6. Octoparse
    7. ParseHub
    8. Apify

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator?
    pass
    AI did not name muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

muratcankoylan/AI-Investigator — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite