RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mx-space/core

Default branch master · commit e7a41dc1 · scanned 6/16/2026, 12:51:58 AM

GitHub: 538 stars · 149 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mx-space/core, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to emphasize self-hosted, headless, AI-powered nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    AI-powered CMS Core for personal blogs, creator homepages & content websites.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    MX Space Core is a self-hosted, headless CMS server designed for personal blogs, creator homepages, and content websites, featuring a full AI content workflow for summaries, translation, moderation, and writing assistance.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://your-project-homepage.com
  • lowreadme#3
    Clarify the project's license directly in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This project is licensed under [Specify License Name(s) here, e.g., 'a custom license combining MIT and Apache-2.0 terms']. See the [LICENSE file](LICENSE) for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mx-space/core
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Strapi
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Strapi · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI's GPT models · recommended 1×
  3. Google Cloud AI · recommended 1×
  4. Perspective API · recommended 1×
  5. Azure AI Content Safety · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What self-hosted headless CMS offers AI features for content generation and moderation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Strapi
    2. OpenAI's GPT models
    3. Google Cloud AI
    4. Perspective API
    5. Azure AI Content Safety
    6. OpenAI's moderation API
    7. Directus
    8. Cohere
    9. Hugging Face models
    10. Payload CMS
    11. Ghost
    12. WordPress
    13. WPGraphQL
    14. AI Engine
    15. WordLift
    16. Content AI by Rank Math
    17. Akismet

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named mx-space/core. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a creator platform with integrated AI tools for content writing and translation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Jasper
    2. Copy.ai
    3. Writesonic
    4. Surfer SEO
    5. Simplified
    6. Rytr

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named mx-space/core. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mx-space/core?
    pass
    AI named mx-space/core explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mx-space/core in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mx-space/core explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mx-space/core solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mx-space/core explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mx-space/core. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mx-space/core.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mx-space/core)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mx-space/core"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mx-space/core.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mx-space/core — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite