RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

nasa/ogma

Default branch develop · commit 69a7b2d1 · scanned 6/4/2026, 9:32:10 PM

GitHub: 565 stars · 52 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface nasa/ogma, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Update README H1 to be more descriptive of the project's core function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # OGMA
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # OGMA: Generator of Runtime Monitors for Flight and Robotics Applications
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a concise 'Why Ogma?' statement to the README introduction

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Ogma simplifies the creation of robust, real-time runtime monitors for critical embedded systems, leveraging Copilot to generate highly optimized C99 code tailored for cFS, ROS, and F' environments.
  • lowreadme#3
    Clarify Ogma's role as a software generator, not a hardware analysis tool

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Ogma is a tool to facilitate the integration of safe runtime monitors into other systems.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Ogma is a software generation tool that facilitates the integration of safe runtime monitors into other systems.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface nasa/ogma
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Lauterbach TRACE32
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Lauterbach TRACE32 · recommended 1×
  2. iSYSTEM winIDEA · recommended 1×
  3. Wind River Workbench · recommended 1×
  4. Percepio Tracealyzer · recommended 1×
  5. SEGGER J-Link · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to implement real-time runtime monitoring for embedded flight software applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Lauterbach TRACE32
    2. iSYSTEM winIDEA
    3. Wind River Workbench
    4. Percepio Tracealyzer
    5. SEGGER J-Link
    6. SEGGER Ozone
    7. SEGGER SystemView
    8. OpenOCD
    9. GDB
    10. Saleae Logic
    11. Keysight
    12. Tektronix

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named nasa/ogma. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a tool to generate runtime verification components for robotic operating systems.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RV-Monitor
    2. Copilot
    3. LTL-to-C
    4. MOP
    5. Spin
    6. NuSMV

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named nasa/ogma. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of nasa/ogma?
    pass
    AI named nasa/ogma explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts nasa/ogma in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named nasa/ogma explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo nasa/ogma solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named nasa/ogma explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of nasa/ogma. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/nasa/ogma.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/nasa/ogma)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/nasa/ogma"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/nasa/ogma.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

nasa/ogma — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite