RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

nashsu/autocli-skill

Default branch main · commit d6ca200b · scanned 6/8/2026, 5:58:24 AM

GitHub: 856 stars · 86 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface nashsu/autocli-skill, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening to clarify AI Agent focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # autocli-skill

> The perfect companion for ClaudeCode/OpenClaw/Agent...
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # autocli-skill: Real-time Web Access for AI Agents (Claude, OpenClaw, etc.)

> The perfect companion for ClaudeCode/OpenClaw/Agent...
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics for better categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, llm-tools, web-scraping, cli, rust, chrome-extension, real-time-data, no-api-keys, claude, openclaw
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage terms

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the MIT License text.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface nashsu/autocli-skill
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
microsoft/playwright
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. microsoft/playwright · recommended 1×
  2. SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 1×
  3. puppeteer/puppeteer · recommended 1×
  4. psf/requests · recommended 1×
  5. crummy/BeautifulSoup · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can my AI agent browse real-time web data without needing API keys?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    2. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    3. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    4. Requests (psf/requests)
    5. Beautiful Soup (crummy/BeautifulSoup)
    6. Scrapy (scrapy/scrapy)
    7. Apify SDK (apify/apify-sdk-js)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named nashsu/autocli-skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to unify command-line access for many web services and desktop applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Raycast
    2. Alfred
    3. Keyboard Maestro
    4. Autohotkey
    5. AutoKey (autokey/autokey)
    6. Zapier
    7. Make (formerly Integromat)
    8. GitHub CLI (cli/cli)
    9. AWS CLI
    10. Google Cloud CLI
    11. Netlify CLI

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named nashsu/autocli-skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of nashsu/autocli-skill?
    pass
    AI did not name nashsu/autocli-skill — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts nashsu/autocli-skill in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named nashsu/autocli-skill explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo nashsu/autocli-skill solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named nashsu/autocli-skill explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of nashsu/autocli-skill. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/nashsu/autocli-skill.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/nashsu/autocli-skill)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/nashsu/autocli-skill"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/nashsu/autocli-skill.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

nashsu/autocli-skill — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite