RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

neavo/LinguaGacha

Default branch main · commit 37ccc374 · scanned 5/14/2026, 12:42:06 PM

GitHub: 1,927 stars · 97 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface neavo/LinguaGacha, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise English summary to the main README.md

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <div align=center></div>
    <div align=center>      </div>
    <p align='center'>使用 AI 能力一键翻译 小说、游戏、字幕 等文本内容的次世代文本翻译器</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align='center'>LinguaGacha is a next-generation AI-powered text translator designed for novels, games, and subtitles, focusing on preserving formatting and ensuring consistent terminology.</p>
    <div align=center></div>
    <div align=center>      </div>
    <p align='center'>使用 AI 能力一键翻译 小说、游戏、字幕 等文本内容的次世代文本翻译器</p>
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-translation, text-translation, game-translation, novel-translation, subtitle-translation, llm, machine-translation, nlp, localization, desktop-app
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage terms

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with a suitable open-source license (e.g., MIT License).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface neavo/LinguaGacha
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
DeepL Pro
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. DeepL Pro · recommended 2×
  2. Google Cloud Translation Advanced · recommended 2×
  3. Microsoft Translator Text API · recommended 2×
  4. SDL Trados Studio · recommended 1×
  5. MemoQ · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tool can translate game scripts and novels while preserving formatting and style?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DeepL Pro
    2. Google Cloud Translation Advanced
    3. SDL Trados Studio
    4. MemoQ
    5. Microsoft Translator Text API

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named neavo/LinguaGacha. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a fast AI text translator for large documents, ensuring consistent terminology and quality.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DeepL Pro
    2. Google Cloud Translation Advanced
    3. Microsoft Translator Text API
    4. Amazon Translate
    5. Systran Pure Neural® Server
    6. SDL Trados Live
    7. Language Weaver

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named neavo/LinguaGacha. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of neavo/LinguaGacha?
    pass
    AI did not name neavo/LinguaGacha — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts neavo/LinguaGacha in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named neavo/LinguaGacha explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo neavo/LinguaGacha solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named neavo/LinguaGacha explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of neavo/LinguaGacha. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/neavo/LinguaGacha.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/neavo/LinguaGacha)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/neavo/LinguaGacha"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/neavo/LinguaGacha.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

neavo/LinguaGacha — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite